Hello, Items specific to the Qt widget set
I am not happy with it :) Windows and 4.2 bindins are not available!
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.

Mailing lists / qt / 2007-09
8 messages · 3 people · –
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
Hello, Items specific to the Qt widget set
I am not happy with it :) Windows and 4.2 bindins are not available!
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
????? ?????? wroteHello, Items specific to the Qt widget set I am not happy with it :) Windows and 4.2 bindins are not available!
look at commit 12163 :)
I am not happy with it :) Windows and 4.2 bindins are not available!
Yes, there should not be commits of temp evaluation versions!
But on the other hand, I just released V1.51.
Please update svn.
I added your LCLMessageEvent.
In your mail there was an usage sample
MessageEvent := QLCLMessageEvent_create(QEventUser, Msg, WParam,
LParam);I think you should not destroy the message.
See Qt doc:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.3/qcoreapplication.html#postEvent
I left some test code in qlclmessageevent.h and the mainwindow demo to verify that.
First enable the more verbose destructor in the QLCLMessageEvent Class. Then recompile the library. Then compile the mainwindow demo and look at the console output. You will see that the event gets destroyed.
I should remove this code in V1.52, remind me if I forget.
regards,
Den Jean
Yes, I already breaked my head trying to understand where should I destroy it :) Thanks for info.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
Yes, there should not be commits of temp evaluation versions! But on the other hand, I…
Yes, I already breaked my head trying to understand where should I destroy it :) Thanks for info.
I already commited code with PostMessage.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
Yes, there should not be commits of temp evaluation versions! But on the other hand, I…
>I am not happy with it :) Windows and 4.2 bindins are not available! Yes, there should not be commits of temp evaluation versions!
it wasn't evaluation version, it was regular v 1.51 from your pages (qt-4.3.1) :), and then others (when you've finished upload).
it wasn't evaluation version, it was regular v 1.51 from your pages (qt-4.3.1) :), and then others (when you've finished upload).
sorry. you were too fast to consider that possibility. :-)
regards,
Den Jean
I just was at right place on right time :)