Hello,
we have veraview IC5 xray device. This device connected to LAN via rj45. It has a IP address. I need get image from this device (cross-platform). How to do this? has any one any idea?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Application_Gallery#MRIcroGL MRIcroGL & MRIcron is viewer, I need to get image from device, after then need viewer.
Thank you.
Mailing lists / lazarus / 2015-05
How to get image from xray device?
7 messages · 2 people ·
- FreeMan 4
- Mark Morgan Lloyd 3
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
FreeMan wrote 8 lines
Hello,
we have veraview IC5 xray device. This device connected to LAN via rj45.
It has a IP address. I need get image from this device (cross-platform).
How to do this? has any one any idea?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Application_Gallery#MRIcroGL
MRIcroGL & MRIcron is viewer, I need to get image from device, after
then need viewer.
Thank you.
What protocols does it support? In extremis, run nmap against it looking for open ports, or put Wireshark between their proprietary software and the instrument.
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 13 lines
FreeMan wrote:
> Hello,
> we have veraview IC5 xray device. This device connected to LAN via
> rj45. It has a IP address. I need get image from this device
> (cross-platform). How to do this? has any one any idea?
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Application_Gallery#MRIcroGL
> MRIcroGL & MRIcron is viewer, I need to get image from device, after
> then need viewer.
> Thank you.
What protocols does it support? In extremis, run XXXX against it looking
for open ports, or put XXXXXXXXX between their proprietary software and
the instrument.
I want to withdraw those suggestions. Google shows that this is a medical device rather than for e.g. non-destructive testing, and any interference with it probably exposes its owner (i.e. the dental practice) to massive liability and might be illegal.
There should be nothing attached to the LAN port that isn't approved by the manufacturer. If the manufacturer approves attachment of a PC, there should be no software on it that is unapproved. If the manufacturer approves attachment to the Internet, then assume that at some point it will be compromised and- potentially- could injure somebody.
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
What protocols does it support? In extremis, run nmap against it looking for open ports,…
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 14 lines
FreeMan wrote:
> Hello,
> we have veraview IC5 xray device. This device connected to LAN via
> rj45. It has a IP address. I need get image from this device
> (cross-platform). How to do this? has any one any idea?
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Application_Gallery#MRIcroGL
> MRIcroGL & MRIcron is viewer, I need to get image from device, after
> then need viewer.
> Thank you.
What protocols does it support? In extremis, run nmap against it
looking for open ports, or put Wireshark between their proprietary
software and the instrument.
sorry for late answer
this is nmap result
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 15:20
Scanning 192.168.240.17 [65535 ports]
Discovered open port 21/tcp on 192.168.240.17
Discovered open port 23/tcp on 192.168.240.17
Discovered open port 2101/tcp on 192.168.240.17
SYN Stealth Scan Timing: About 39.40% done; ETC: 15:21 (0:00:48 remaining) Discovered open port 2201/tcp on 192.168.240.17
Discovered open port 2202/tcp on 192.168.240.17
Discovered open port 2204/tcp on 192.168.240.17
Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 15:21, 74.52s elapsed (65535 total ports)
I want to withdraw those suggestions. Google shows that this is a medical device rather…
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 5 lines
I want to withdraw those suggestions. Google shows that this is a
medical device rather than for e.g. non-destructive testing, and any
interference with it probably exposes its owner (i.e. the dental
practice) to massive liability and might be illegal.
Not to be illegal, 'cos This device in our clinic and using as long as five years. I'm not hack or modified device parts or etc. Law say "Can not do this" service & seller not gived any paper :)
Show quoted text 7 lines
There should be nothing attached to the LAN port that isn't approved
by the manufacturer. If the manufacturer approves attachment of a PC,
there should be no software on it that is unapproved. If the
manufacturer approves attachment to the Internet, then assume that at
some point it will be compromised and- potentially- could injure
somebody.
http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en
I found this code, not yet found how do work in lazarus.
FreeMan wrote 9 lines
On 25.05.2015 15:29, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I want to withdraw those suggestions. Google shows that this is a
> medical device rather than for e.g. non-destructive testing, and any
> interference with it probably exposes its owner (i.e. the dental
> practice) to massive liability and might be illegal.
>
Not to be illegal, 'cos This device in our clinic and using as long as
five years. I'm not hack or modified device parts or etc. Law say "Can
not do this" service & seller not gived any paper :)
If a dentist started hacking his equipment in the EU or USA, I'm fairly sure that he would rapidly be in serious trouble with his regulators.
Show quoted text 9 lines
> There should be nothing attached to the LAN port that isn't approved
> by the manufacturer. If the manufacturer approves attachment of a PC,
> there should be no software on it that is unapproved. If the
> manufacturer approves attachment to the Internet, then assume that at
> some point it will be compromised and- potentially- could injure
> somebody.
>
http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en
I found this code, not yet found how do work in lazarus.
Quite frankly, I think that telnetting to that port 23 and typing "help", or FTPing to that port 21, would be unwise and could get you in trouble.
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 5 lines
If a dentist started hacking his equipment in the EU or USA, I'm
fairly sure that he would rapidly be in serious trouble with his
regulators.
Yes you right, But I'm not hacking. We have a program appointment, patients all detail etc and add xray too. just do this not image proccess.
Show quoted text 13 lines
>> There should be nothing attached to the LAN port that isn't approved
>> by the manufacturer. If the manufacturer approves attachment of a
>> PC, there should be no software on it that is unapproved. If the
>> manufacturer approves attachment to the Internet, then assume that
>> at some point it will be compromised and- potentially- could injure
>> somebody.
>>
> http://dicom.offis.de/dcmtk.php.en
> I found this code, not yet found how do work in lazarus.
Quite frankly, I think that telnetting to that port 23 and typing
"help", or FTPing to that port 21, would be unwise and could get you
in trouble.
I have same idea, 2101, 2201,2202.... this ports using I thing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20150525/9c0d98e2/attachment.html>