Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 1999-05

Compatible GTK Versions

5 messages · 3 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Cliff Baeseman
to Michael Anthon: I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread... What versions…

Are you also running GNOME.?

Your compiler is probably still using the new gtk....The headers as they stand now are 1.0 or 1.1 somethng like that...

We are hammering away at the 1.2.2 upgrade just as fast as we can.... Your best bet is to wait a few days til we can get up to the real 1.2.2 stuff or help out with conversion if you wish to..

Sorry we are just a little behind...

Cliff

Michael Anthon wrote 15 lines
I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread... What versions of GTK are actually suitable for compiling as it stands? I can't seem to find this info anywhere. Perhaps it would be worth editing http://www.pcpros.net/~vbman/things.html to include this info ? I just tried with 1.1.2 (rpms from RH 5.2) and I still can't get it to work.... does it need to be <1.1 ? Cheers _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Sergio Kessler
to Michael Anthon: I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread... What versions…
Michael Anthon wrote 9 lines
I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread... What versions of GTK are actually suitable for compiling as it stands? I can't seem to find this info anywhere. Perhaps it would be worth editing http://www.pcpros.net/~vbman/things.html to include this info ? I just tried with 1.1.2 (rpms from RH 5.2) and I still can't get it to work.... does it need to be <1.1 ?

hey, 1.1.2 are beta (almost alpha) releases
I can't compile Lazarus, but I hope it is just temporary :) (working for 1.2.x)
If you can update to RH 6.0 (very good release)

| Sergio A. Kessler http://perio.unlp.edu.ar/~sergio -O_O- Keep working at it... you will either succeed, or become an expert.

Reply by email

Michael Anthon

BAH !! I'm about to update to Debian 2.1 !!!

I managed to get as far as compiling a couple of the gtk examples using 1.0.6 (clist, list and entry). None of the others would compile. Was able to compile but not link Lazarus then.

Changed to 1.1.2. Recompiled and re-installed the gtk libs, then I could not compile or link any of the examples, however I could compile and link the fcl and compile lazarus. Linking of Lazarus still failed with almost identical errors to 1.0.6. (See below if you are interested....)

I think I might just sit tight and wait for the 1.2 headers to be done 8^)

Cheers

-----Original Message----- From: Sergio Kessler Sent: Saturday, 8 May 1999 10:39 To:

<snip>

If you can update to RH 6.0 (very good release)

bash> ./ppas.sh
Linking ./lazarus
./graphics.o: In function `_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_CREATE': ./graphics.o(.text+0x0): multiple definition of
`_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_CREATE'
graphics.o(.text+0x0): first defined here
./graphics.o: In function `_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_SETCOLOR$TCOLOR': ./graphics.o(.text+0x2c): multiple definition of
`_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_SETCOLOR$TCOLOR'
graphics.o(.text+0x2c): first defined here
./graphics.o: In function `_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_SETBCOLOR$TCOLOR': ./graphics.o(.text+0x3c): multiple definition of
`_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_SETBCOLOR$TCOLOR'
graphics.o(.text+0x3c): first defined here
./graphics.o: In function `_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_DESTROY': ./graphics.o(.text+0x4c): multiple definition of
`_GRAPHICSS$$_$$_TFONT_DESTROY'
graphics.o(.text+0x4c): first defined here
./graphics.o: In function `RTTI_GRAPHICSS$_TGRAPHICSOBJECT': ./graphics.o(.data+0xde): multiple definition of
`RTTI_GRAPHICSS$_TGRAPHICSOBJECT'
graphics.o(.data+0xde): first defined here
./graphics.o(.data+0x34): multiple definition of
`VMT_GRAPHICSS$_TGRAPHICSOBJECT'
graphics.o(.data+0x34): first defined here
./graphics.o: In function `RTTI_GRAPHICSS$_TFONT': ./graphics.o(.data+0x105): multiple definition of `RTTI_GRAPHICSS$_TFONT' graphics.o(.data+0x105): first defined here
./graphics.o(.data+0x9e): multiple definition of `VMT_GRAPHICSS$_TFONT' graphics.o(.data+0x9e): first defined here
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o: In function `_GTK$$_GTK_TYPE_WINDOW_TYPE': /usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x523): undefined reference to `gtk_type_builtins'
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o: In function `_GTK$$_GTK_TYPE_STATE_TYPE': /usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x53b): undefined reference to `gtk_type_builtins'
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o: In function `_GTK$$_GTK_TYPE_DIRECTION_TYPE': /usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x553): undefined reference to `gtk_type_builtins'
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o: In function `_GTK$$_GTK_TYPE_SHADOW_TYPE': /usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x56b): undefined reference to `gtk_type_builtins'
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o: In function `_GTK$$_GTK_TYPE_ARROW_TYPE': /usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x583): undefined reference to `gtk_type_builtins'
/usr/src/pp/src/gtk/gtk.o(.text+0x59b): more undefined references to `gtk_type_builtins' follow
/usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_supported' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_error' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_make_resident' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_close' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_name' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_symbol' /usr/lib/libgtk.so: undefined reference to `g_module_open' An error occurred while linking ./lazarus

Reply by email

Michael Anthon

No need for an apology. I would love to help out, but suspect I would be more of a hinderance than a help !! I will keep banging away at this 8^)

Cheers

Show quoted text 50 lines
-----Original Message----- From: Cliff Baeseman Sent: Friday, 7 May 1999 2:28 To: Subject: Re: [lazarus] Compatible GTK Versions Are you also running GNOME.? Your compiler is probably still using the new gtk....The headers as they stand now are 1.0 or 1.1 somethng like that... We are hammering away at the 1.2.2 upgrade just as fast as we can.... Your best bet is to wait a few days til we can get up to the real 1.2.2 stuff or help out with conversion if you wish to.. Sorry we are just a little behind... Cliff Michael Anthon wrote: > I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread... > > What versions of GTK are actually suitable for compiling as it stands? I > can't seem to find this info anywhere. Perhaps it would be worth editing > http://www.pcpros.net/~vbman/things.html to include this info ? > > I just tried with 1.1.2 (rpms from RH 5.2) and I still can't get it to > work.... does it need to be <1.1 ? > > Cheers > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe: mail with > "unsubscribe" as the Subject > archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Michael Anthon

I thought this was getting a little off the topic of my original thread...

What versions of GTK are actually suitable for compiling as it stands? I can't seem to find this info anywhere. Perhaps it would be worth editing http://www.pcpros.net/~vbman/things.html to include this info ?

I just tried with 1.1.2 (rpms from RH 5.2) and I still can't get it to work.... does it need to be <1.1 ?

Cheers

Reply by email