Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 1999-05

RPM Install

13 messages · 5 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Cliff Baeseman
to Sergio A. Kessler: (Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999 12:25:32 -0500, escribi�: what about doing…

That would be very very handy I will include the doc in the RPM install....

Cliff

Sergio A. Kessler wrote 23 lines
(Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999 12:25:32 -0500, escribi�: >Thanx, > >Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... > >Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. > >After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, >fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. what about doing no one, but two or three rpms (lazarus, FPC, etc) ? btw, I can make a document, if you want, that explains how to setup all in /opt/fpc and stay to date with the cvs. Sergio _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Cliff Baeseman
to Peter Vreman

Oh do not worry we are going to test the hell out of it....

Cliff

Peter Vreman wrote 12 lines
The gtk 1.2 interface is now also working with the win32 port of GTK. There need to be done some testing, becuase i don't know if all the bitfield things are correctly aligned, and if the record sizes are correct. Peter _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Shane Miller
Well, I am trying to rebuild the compiler but am getting an error in Linux.pp
(2858,9) Fatal : Syntax error ; expected but identifier K found

Not sure why...
I downloaded all the daliy snapshots and unziped them into correct directorys.

Shane

>> Cliff Baeseman 05/10 12:26 PM >>>

Thanx,

Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight....

Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase.

After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc.

If I do this am I going to have to install to a different directory than FPC?

Should I keep our stuff separated, I think that I probably should to avoid conflicts. I can then control
what we are using to avoid compatibility problems. Lazarus will ultimately pass all the switches and paths to the compiler vs using the config unit because those settings are in the project file.

We probably should coordinate this with the FPC fellas. If I do this correctly it will allow easy setup
for someone who does not care to use lazarus but just want's the compiler.

Hopefully this will end most of the New User Problems once and for all....

Cliff

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Sergio Kessler
to Sergio A. Kessler: (Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999 12:25:32 -0500, escribi�: what about doing…
Cliff Baeseman wrote
That would be very very handy I will include the doc in the RPM install....

ok, I will try to write something for tomorow...
but the /opt directory is not for rpms :)

Sergio

Show quoted text 30 lines
Sergio A. Kessler wrote: > (Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999 > 12:25:32 -0500, escribi�: > > >Thanx, > > > >Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... > > > >Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. > > > >After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, > >fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. > > what about doing no one, but two or three rpms (lazarus, FPC, etc) ? > > btw, I can make a document, if you want, that explains how to setup > all in /opt/fpc and stay to date with the cvs. > > Sergio > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe: mail with > "unsubscribe" as the Subject > archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus
| Sergio A. Kessler http://perio.unlp.edu.ar/~sergio -O_O- Keep working at it... you will either succeed, or become an expert.

Reply by email

Peter Vreman
to Shane Miller: I abourted my attemp to compile the binary. I am having a path problem on my system that…
you wrote
OK I will give it a shot when I get home...

Just get:

base.zip
compiler.zip
rtl.zip

unzip all in one directory

copy from base/ the makefile.fpc and makefile to the current directory

type: 'make compiler_all'

and then 'make compiler_install'

Show quoted text 76 lines
Cliff -----Original Message----- From: Shane Miller Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 2:54 PM To: Subject: Re: [lazarus] RPM Install I abourted my attemp to compile the binary. I am having a path problem on my system that involves me moving stuff back and forth. First it said it couldn't find systemh.inc so I solved that, now it said ...hmmm...some other file. I'm going to work on the code and Cliff or someone else can create the binary. My talents (limited) are better served working on the code instead of messing with Linux which I don't fuilly understand yet. When the binary is updated, let me know. Shane >>> Peter Vreman 05/10 2:44 PM >>> At 19:25 10-5-99 , you wrote: >Thanx, > >Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... > >Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. > >After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, >fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. > >If I do this am I going to have to install to a different directory than >FPC? I think we should create different RPM's which all depend on eachother fpc-compiler fpc-rtl fpc-fcl fpc-gtk and then you can depend lazarus on the needed rpm's. When everything works fine we can even create .rpm snapshots. And .deb's ofcourse ;) >Should I keep our stuff separated, I think that I probably should to avoid >conflicts. I can then control >what we are using to avoid compatibility problems. Lazarus will ultimately >pass all the switches and paths to the compiler vs using the config unit >because those settings are in the project file. > >We probably should coordinate this with the FPC fellas. If I do this >correctly it will allow easy setup >for someone who does not care to use lazarus but just want's the compiler. > >Hopefully this will end most of the New User Problems once and for all.... Except if they still choose to download the .tar.gz instead of the .rpm :) _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Cliff Baeseman
to Shane Miller: I abourted my attemp to compile the binary. I am having a path problem on my system that…

OK I will give it a shot when I get home...

Cliff

Earlier message 69 lines
-----Original Message----- From: Shane Miller Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 2:54 PM To: Subject: Re: [lazarus] RPM Install I abourted my attemp to compile the binary. I am having a path problem on my system that involves me moving stuff back and forth. First it said it couldn't find systemh.inc so I solved that, now it said ...hmmm...some other file. I'm going to work on the code and Cliff or someone else can create the binary. My talents (limited) are better served working on the code instead of messing with Linux which I don't fuilly understand yet. When the binary is updated, let me know. Shane >>> Peter Vreman 05/10 2:44 PM >>> At 19:25 10-5-99 , you wrote: >Thanx, > >Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... > >Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. > >After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, >fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. > >If I do this am I going to have to install to a different directory than >FPC? I think we should create different RPM's which all depend on eachother fpc-compiler fpc-rtl fpc-fcl fpc-gtk and then you can depend lazarus on the needed rpm's. When everything works fine we can even create .rpm snapshots. And .deb's ofcourse ;) >Should I keep our stuff separated, I think that I probably should to avoid >conflicts. I can then control >what we are using to avoid compatibility problems. Lazarus will ultimately >pass all the switches and paths to the compiler vs using the config unit >because those settings are in the project file. > >We probably should coordinate this with the FPC fellas. If I do this >correctly it will allow easy setup >for someone who does not care to use lazarus but just want's the compiler. > >Hopefully this will end most of the New User Problems once and for all.... Except if they still choose to download the .tar.gz instead of the .rpm :) _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Cliff Baeseman
to Shane Miller: Well, I am trying to rebuild the compiler but am getting an error in Linux.pp (2858,9)…

You will have to fix it nico mentioned the error there is a missing semi colon on that line in the source of linux.pp ;)

Cliff

Earlier message 56 lines
-----Original Message----- From: Shane Miller Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 12:37 PM To: Subject: Re: [lazarus] RPM Install Well, I am trying to rebuild the compiler but am getting an error in Linux.pp (2858,9) Fatal : Syntax error ; expected but identifier K found Not sure why... I downloaded all the daliy snapshots and unziped them into correct directorys. Shane >>> Cliff Baeseman 05/10 12:26 PM >>> Thanx, Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. If I do this am I going to have to install to a different directory than FPC? Should I keep our stuff separated, I think that I probably should to avoid conflicts. I can then control what we are using to avoid compatibility problems. Lazarus will ultimately pass all the switches and paths to the compiler vs using the config unit because those settings are in the project file. We probably should coordinate this with the FPC fellas. If I do this correctly it will allow easy setup for someone who does not care to use lazarus but just want's the compiler. Hopefully this will end most of the New User Problems once and for all.... Cliff _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Sergio Kessler
to Peter Vreman: FPC has already his directory in /usr/lib/fpc/$VERSION/ Peter
> btw, I can make a document, if you want, that explains how to setup > all in /opt/fpc and stay to date with the cvs. FPC has already his directory in /usr/lib/fpc/$VERSION/

yep, but I've found more difficult to follow this, I think this is good for packagers, but for people that only work with tar.gz is more easy to use the /opt directory, no need to deal with differents locations, etc. and if you get tired just nuke /opt/fpc :)
I'm thinking in only developers, I expect users to use rpms or debs.

The /opt directory (as defined by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard -FHS) is where all things not installed by a package, self maintained, should go...

I'm missing something ?

| Sergio A. Kessler http://perio.unlp.edu.ar/~sergio -O_O- Keep working at it... you will either succeed, or become an expert.

Reply by email

Peter Vreman
to Shane Miller: Well, I am trying to rebuild the compiler but am getting an error in Linux.pp (2858,9)…
you wrote
Well, I am trying to rebuild the compiler but am getting an error in Linux.pp (2858,9) Fatal : Syntax error ; expected but identifier K found

I added that bug to test how smart you are with fixing bugs ;)

Not sure why... I downloaded all the daliy snapshots and unziped them into correct directorys.

Don't you have CVS ? Then you can use the CVS to update it. See for an explanation what you need and how to install my message from 9 may to fpc-pascal.

Reply by email

Peter Vreman
to Sergio A. Kessler: (Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999 12:25:32 -0500, escribi�: what about doing…
Show quoted text 13 lines
>Thanx, > >Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... > >Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. > >After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, >fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. what about doing no one, but two or three rpms (lazarus, FPC, etc) ? btw, I can make a document, if you want, that explains how to setup all in /opt/fpc and stay to date with the cvs.

FPC has already his directory in /usr/lib/fpc/$VERSION/

Peter

Reply by email

Sergio A. Kessler

(Cliff Baeseman) el d�a Mon, 10 May 1999
12:25:32 -0500, escribi�:

Show quoted text 8 lines
Thanx, Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc.

what about doing no one, but two or three rpms (lazarus, FPC, etc) ?

btw, I can make a document, if you want, that explains how to setup all in /opt/fpc and stay to date with the cvs.

Sergio

Reply by email

Shane Miller

I abourted my attemp to compile the binary. I am having a path problem on my system that involves me moving stuff back and forth. First it said it couldn't find systemh.inc so I solved that, now it said ...hmmm...some other file. I'm going to work on the code and Cliff or someone else can create the binary.

My talents (limited) are better served working on the code instead of messing with Linux which I don't fuilly understand yet.

When the binary is updated, let me know.
Shane

>> Peter Vreman 05/10 2:44 PM >>>
you wrote 11 lines
Thanx, Looks like I will be doing alot of system reconfiguring tonight.... Once I get upgraded I will move lazarus to the 1.2 codebase. After I complete this I am going to build a RPM that will install lazarus, fcl, compiler and the GTK. I will check everything for required files etc. If I do this am I going to have to install to a different directory than FPC?

I think we should create different RPM's which all depend on eachother

fpc-compiler
fpc-rtl
fpc-fcl
fpc-gtk

and then you can depend lazarus on the needed rpm's. When everything works fine we can even create .rpm snapshots.

And .deb's ofcourse ;)

Show quoted text 11 lines
Should I keep our stuff separated, I think that I probably should to avoid conflicts. I can then control what we are using to avoid compatibility problems. Lazarus will ultimately pass all the switches and paths to the compiler vs using the config unit because those settings are in the project file. We probably should coordinate this with the FPC fellas. If I do this correctly it will allow easy setup for someone who does not care to use lazarus but just want's the compiler. Hopefully this will end most of the New User Problems once and for all....

Except if they still choose to download the .tar.gz instead of the .rpm :)

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email