Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2013-11

Problem building fixes_2_6

8 messages · 4 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Reinier Olislagers

Trying to build 2.6 fixes on x86 with fpcup, Windows, starting with fpc2.6.2 compiler; I get:
classes.inc(136,11) Warning: Symbol "Resume" is deprecated C:/development/fpcbootstrap/ppc386.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../i386 -Fi../win -FE. -FUC:/development/fpc263/rtl/units/i386-win32 -di386 -dRELEASE ../inc/macpas.pp
make[7]: Leaving directory `C:/development/fpc263/rtl/win32' make[7]: *** No rule to make target `iso7185.ppu', needed by `fpc_units'. Stop.

Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok...

Thanks,
Reinier

[1] Yes, crystal ball gazing is very much appreciated, thanks ;) Of course, happy to provide more info.

Reply by email

Florian Klämpfl
to Reinier Olislagers
Reinier Olislagers wrote 11 lines
Trying to build 2.6 fixes on x86 with fpcup, Windows, starting with fpc2.6.2 compiler; I get: classes.inc(136,11) Warning: Symbol "Resume" is deprecated C:/development/fpcbootstrap/ppc386.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../i386 -Fi../win -FE. -FUC:/development/fpc263/rtl/units/i386-win32 -di386 -dRELEASE ../inc/macpas.pp make[7]: Leaving directory `C:/development/fpc263/rtl/win32' make[7]: *** No rule to make target `iso7185.ppu', needed by `fpc_units'. Stop. Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1]

2.6.x cannot be built with make 3.82. Use make 3.80 as it is provided e.g. by the fpc 2.6.2 installer for win32.

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Reinier Olislagers: Trying to build 2.6 fixes on x86 with fpcup, Windows, starting with fpc2.6.2 compiler; I…

In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:

Show quoted text 12 lines
Trying to build 2.6 fixes on x86 with fpcup, Windows, starting with fpc2.6.2 compiler; I get: classes.inc(136,11) Warning: Symbol "Resume" is deprecated C:/development/fpcbootstrap/ppc386.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc -Fi../i386 -Fi../win -FE. -FUC:/development/fpc263/rtl/units/i386-win32 -di386 -dRELEASE ../inc/macpas.pp make[7]: Leaving directory `C:/development/fpc263/rtl/win32' make[7]: *** No rule to make target `iso7185.ppu', needed by `fpc_units'. Stop. Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok...

IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82?

Reply by email

Reinier Olislagers
to Marco van de Voort
Marco van de Voort wrote 15 lines
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: > Trying to build 2.6 fixes on x86 with fpcup, Windows, starting with > fpc2.6.2 compiler; I get: > classes.inc(136,11) Warning: Symbol "Resume" is deprecated > C:/development/fpcbootstrap/ppc386.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fi../inc > -Fi../i386 -Fi../win -FE. -FUC:/development/fpc263/rtl/units/i386-win32 > -di386 -dRELEASE ../inc/macpas.pp > make[7]: Leaving directory `C:/development/fpc263/rtl/win32' > make[7]: *** No rule to make target `iso7185.ppu', needed by > `fpc_units'. Stop. > > Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] > I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok... IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82?

Yes, of course <slaps forehead> - of course this is coming back to bite me...

Thanks a lot, guys.

Reply by email

waldo kitty
to Reinier Olislagers
Reinier Olislagers wrote
On 17/11/2013 18:38, Marco van de Voort wrote: > In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said:

[...]

Show quoted text 9 lines
>> Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] >> I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok... > > IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82? Yes, of course <slaps forehead> - of course this is coming back to bite me... Thanks a lot, guys.

how has fpcup been able to build 2.6.x if fpc 2.6.x cannot be made with make 3.82?

NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless private contact is specifically requested and granted.

Reply by email

Reinier Olislagers
to waldo kitty
waldo kitty wrote 17 lines
On 11/17/2013 12:41 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > On 17/11/2013 18:38, Marco van de Voort wrote: >> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: [...] >>> Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] >>> I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok... >> >> IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82? > > Yes, of course <slaps forehead> - of course this is coming back to bite > me... > > Thanks a lot, guys. how has fpcup been able to build 2.6.x if fpc 2.6.x cannot be made with make 3.82?

By downloading and using make, as usual. You haven't ever used fpcup, have you?

Reply by email

waldo kitty
to Reinier Olislagers
Reinier Olislagers wrote 20 lines
On 18/11/2013 00:48, waldo kitty wrote: > On 11/17/2013 12:41 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> On 17/11/2013 18:38, Marco van de Voort wrote: >>> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: > [...] >>>> Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] >>>> I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok... >>> >>> IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82? >> >> Yes, of course <slaps forehead> - of course this is coming back to bite >> me... >> >> Thanks a lot, guys. > > how has fpcup been able to build 2.6.x if fpc 2.6.x cannot be made with > make 3.82? > By downloading and using make, as usual.

seems my question was misunderstood... the previous conversations seem to indicate that make 3.82 was being (downloaded and??) used instead of 3.80... that's why i asked how fpc 2.8.x had been being built with make 3.82...

You haven't ever used fpcup, have you?

not yet... it is on the list but i also don't want to crash my current working setup where fpc and lazarus are "installed" in their checkout directories (as described in the wiki)... it works and i'm used to it but it did take me some time to understand it ;)

NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless private contact is specifically requested and granted.

Reply by email

Reinier Olislagers
to waldo kitty
waldo kitty wrote 26 lines
On 11/18/2013 2:01 AM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: > On 18/11/2013 00:48, waldo kitty wrote: >> On 11/17/2013 12:41 PM, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >>> On 17/11/2013 18:38, Marco van de Voort wrote: >>>> In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: >> [...] >>>>> Is it me, fpcup or should something be fixed in... ehrm fixes?[1] >>>>> I noticed the Jenkins build server seems to build fixes ok... >>>> >>>> IIRC this means you are not using 2.6.2 issued make, but 3.82? >>> >>> Yes, of course <slaps forehead> - of course this is coming back to bite >>> me... >>> >>> Thanks a lot, guys. >> >> how has fpcup been able to build 2.6.x if fpc 2.6.x cannot be made with >> make 3.82? >> > > By downloading and using make, as usual. seems my question was misunderstood... the previous conversations seem to indicate that make 3.82 was being (downloaded and??) used instead of 3.80... that's why i asked how fpc 2.8.x had been being built with make 3.82...

Well, IMO if you have no experience with fpcup it's hard to tell what the conversation seems to indicate. That was more or less my point.

In any case, my problem was already solved.

Thanks,
Reinier

Reply by email