Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2009-03

Should data structures part in LCL be moved to FCL?

6 messages · 3 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Marco van de Voort
to leledumbo

In our previous episode, leledumbo said:

I found some data structure related units in LCL (AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray, DynHashArray, DynQueue, etc.). To be consistent (LCL: visual components, FCL: non-visual), wouldn't it be better to move them to FCL?

What is there that is not already in FPC ? Are these not simply leftovers of older times when Lazarus still had to compile with 1.0.x?

Reply by email

leledumbo
to Marco van de Voort

AvgLvlTree, DynamicArray,

DynHashArray, DynQueue
Marco van de Voort wrote 5 lines
What is there that is not already in FPC ? Are these not simply leftovers of older times when Lazarus still had to compile with 1.0.x?

Oh, I didn't know about it. The first time I use Lazarus FPC was already 2.0.4. Well, some of them has FCL counterparts and some don't: AvgLvlTree = AVL_Tree
DynamicArray = ??? (object wrapper of normal dynamic array?) DynQueue = TObjectQueue or TQueue
DynHashArray = ???
LazLinkedList = ???

I miss these data structures in FCL: linked list, graph, and tree (not AVL one).

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Should-data-structures-part-in-LCL-be-moved-to-FCL--tp22434763p22448666.html Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing list .

Reply by email