Hi,
I use FpIOctl from "BaseUnix" . My platform is Linux. I do FpOpen then FpIOCTL. It works!
However:
The kernel 2.6 has a new naming convention for the function number. See the file: asm/ioctl.h
This file contains many constants and the final call number is assembled from the direction type, device number, function number, etc...
I wanted to write a unit that would simulate this file (ioctl.h), but, this header file contains mainly macros. I do not think that it is possible to write some Pascal code that would in fact be a macro! If someone knows if it possible to write macros in Pascal please tell me.
In the mean time, I calculate the function number "by hand", knowing the device number, function number, IO_RW, etc... Or if I use a precedure do do this, then this will slow the program down.
For the Windows platform, I can not help you sorry.
Thank you
Alain Michaud
Marc Santhoff wrote 19 lines
Hi,
on FreeBSD I use fpOpen, fpIoctl, etc. to drive some generic device. In
my porting efforts to win32 I have found the more generic FileOpen, but
no equivalent of fpIoctl or it's underlying unix system call ioctl().
An old win32.hlp told me Windows has "DeviceIoCtl()", but I'm not really
sure if this is what I need. At least there is ntohing about this
funtion in the RTL sources of fps 2.0.2.
How can I port this calls?
TIA,
Marc
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist -
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal