Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2009-09

document header mistakes

3 messages · 3 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Graeme Geldenhuys

Hi Michael,

I'm not picking on you, I promise! :-) I'm just doing my bit evaluating the upcoming FPC 2.4 release - code & docs.

-------[ ref.xxx ]-----------

1) In the current ref.ps & ref.pdf documents, page 6 doesn't contain a header, where all pages before and after it has got headers (which contains the section title).

2) Page 7 actually contains page 6's header. "List of Tables". I think page 7 should not have a header, or maybe "About this Guide"?

-------[ prog.xxx ]-----------

1) Same problem as number 2 above. Page 11 seems to have the wrong header title.

2) Also the section number is a bit odd. "0.1" - but that's not really a biggy. Maybe the section number could be left out like was done in the ref.xxx document.

It's all about consistency. ;-)

Regards,
- Graeme -

fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/

Reply by email

Michael Van Canneyt
to Graeme Geldenhuys
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote
Hi Michael, I'm not picking on you, I promise! :-) I'm just doing my bit evaluating the upcoming FPC 2.4 release - code & docs.

Too late, the intercontinental ballistic missile has left....

Show quoted text 10 lines
-------[ ref.xxx ]----------- 1) In the current ref.ps & ref.pdf documents, page 6 doesn't contain a header, where all pages before and after it has got headers (which contains the section title). 2) Page 7 actually contains page 6's header. "List of Tables". I think page 7 should not have a header, or maybe "About this Guide"?

I'm not sure I can fix those, this is a latex issue; maybe an additional pass will fix it.

Show quoted text 11 lines
-------[ prog.xxx ]----------- 1) Same problem as number 2 above. Page 11 seems to have the wrong header title. 2) Also the section number is a bit odd. "0.1" - but that's not really a biggy. Maybe the section number could be left out like was done in the ref.xxx document. It's all about consistency. ;-)

I'll have a .

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Michael Van Canneyt

In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:

Show quoted text 7 lines
> 2) Also the section number is a bit odd. "0.1" - but that's not really a > biggy. Maybe the section number could be left out like was done in the > ref.xxx document. > > It's all about consistency. ;-) I'll have a that the HTML relinking abuses this fact iirc.

Reply by email