Hi,

I downloaded a while back the FPC 2.2.0 and 2.2.4 documentation in PDF and PS format. In both cases the chart.* files were incorrect (I believe).

The filename implies a "chart", so I gathered that it is a class chart / hierarchy of some kind. But when I view it, it is just a listing of the local compiler switches. Is this correct? In that case, I don't understand the logic behind the filename chart.xxx

Regards,
- Graeme -

If you have a suggestion, I'll be glad to change the name.

Michael.

Michael Van Canneyt het geskryf:

If you have a suggestion, I'll be glad to change the name.

So the name and content is correct? Umm, so how did you get to the name "chart"? :-) When I opened that file, I expected the class hierarchy chart - you know, like the one Borland gave with D7 & K3.

Umm, name suggestions (something I suck at):

compiler_switches.xxx ???

and for those poor folks with DOS 1.0, maybe:

comp_swh.xxx

I much rather prefer the first option though.

Regards,
- Graeme -

It is the "compiler switches quick reference chart". Or maybe better ""compiler switches quick reference card".

Vincent

Vincent Snijders het geskryf:

> It is the "compiler switches quick reference chart". Or maybe better ""compiler switches quick reference card".

Ah, like the ones in the "Dummies guide of ..." books. :-) Then maybe "quickref.xxx" is a better name than "chart.xxx" - that's if we limit ourselves to 8.3 names (80's style).

Alternatively: fpc_quick_reference_card.xxx

Regards,
- Graeme -