Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / qt / 2008-02

Qt bindings

3 messages · 3 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Paul Ishenin

Hello, Items specific to the Qt widget set

While surfing qt web site I found very related to our bindings page: http://www.blogistan.co.uk/qt/qt/qt_bindings/

I dont know whether trolltech guys are well informed about pascal bindings but I cannot find any info in their page. Den, I think it will not hurt if you aknowledge them about your bindings page. Maybe they'll contribute something to freepascal too - like kde4 bindings.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.

ik
to Paul Ishenin

Two of a KDE developers that I know, also knows about the binding for FPC, however they pretty much ignores it.

Ido

Paul Ishenin wrote 17 lines
Hello, Items specific to the Qt widget set While surfing qt web site I found very related to our bindings page: http://www.blogistan.co.uk/qt/qt/qt_bindings/ I dont know whether trolltech guys are well informed about pascal bindings but I cannot find any info in their page. Den, I think it will not hurt if you aknowledge them about your bindings page. Maybe they'll contribute something to freepascal too - like kde4 bindings. Best regards, Paul Ishenin. _______________________________________________ Qt mailing list http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/qt
Den Jean
to Paul Ishenin: Hello, Items specific to the Qt widget set While surfing qt web site I found very related…
am Paul Ishenin wrote
While surfing qt web site I found very related to our bindings page: http://www.blogistan.co.uk/qt/qt/qt_bindings/

I tried the different paths at the time. (florian and others too)

http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2003-September/013647.html They were too difficult and without pascal language support.

You have either script language binding support
(smoke) -> not easy for a static language as pascal or either pure c -> too poor for pascal
With my own generator I have more flexibility and no dependancy like the qt3 binding of Hausladen (qtc based, but the qtc binding is not maintained anymore).

Trolltech is aware of the binding and approved commercial use of Lazarus with Qt through the binding (like PyQt).

The other bindings (all script languages now) do not care about pascal, because my goal is different: I do not try to have a complete binding for pascal that would allow to program directly in pascal for qt/kde4. Lazarus/LCL should be must nicer.
Due to the nature/power of dynamic languages, it is nice to for e.g. progam in PyQt,but I would not program in a Pascal/Qt. However with LCL it becomes nice again :-)