Michael Van Canneyt wrote 17 lines
you are right Michael, the subject line i used was incorrect, i should have written "no EXTERNAL widget set required". but the text of my message was correct. the stripped-down GTK code, written in C, is being made a part of the ELF binary that is produced.
why would statically linking C code (YTK in this case) into the ELF binary of a Lazarus GUI application unacceptable? the end result is a single ELF binary that does not depend upon any widget-set being available on the end user's computer, which is kinda the goal!
there is also no reason why someone should not pass the YTK source code through a C-to-pascal converter, although why one would want to bother with this pointless step is beyond me.
as you will see in the lazarus forum thread, this is NOT being put forward as an alternative to getting GTK3 support up and running, but rather as "another string added to our bow".
cheers,
rob :-)
