Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2016-11

Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

12 messages · 5 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara

Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port.

In Lazarus-CCR:

virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained
virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port

In GitHub:
https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus : active repository of current port

Some history how we got that:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26581.msg174292.html#msg174292

In order to bring some sanity, i added a note in the Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview-new repository about its deprecation.The idea is to remove in the near future. The development history, for any need, will be kept at https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus-History

I don't own rights about of Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview repository so not comfortable in taking any decision about it. I will let for Lazarus-CCR admins decide what to do with it

Luiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161122/a443b178/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Werner Pamler
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR:…
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote 24 lines
Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port In GitHub: https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus : active repository of current port Some history how we got that: http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26581.msg174292.html#msg174292 In order to bring some sanity, i added a note in the Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview-new repository about its deprecation.The idea is to remove in the near future. The development history, for any need, will be kept at https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus-History I don't own rights about of Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview repository so not comfortable in taking any decision about it. I will let for Lazarus-CCR admins decide what to do with it

Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every user will get notified at compilation that he is using an unsupported version.

Shouldn't we do the same with
- ZVDateTimeCtrls (in in Lazarus/components/DateTimeCtrls
- csvdocument (is in fpc sources/packages(fp-base)
- lclextension (belongs to VTV somehow) ?

There are other folders such as acs, kontrols, htmlport, and probably some more which seem to have active maintainers somewhere on github as well. What to do with them?

Reply by email

Mattias Gaertner
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR:…

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus

Show quoted text 6 lines
Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port

Proposal:
Delete files in those folders and add README.txt pointing to new repository.

Mattias

Reply by email

Ondrej Pokorny
to Mattias Gaertner
Mattias Gaertner wrote 13 lines
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: > Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. > > In Lazarus-CCR: > > virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained > virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port Proposal: Delete files in those folders and add README.txt pointing to new repository.

What will be the new one and only repository? The one on GitHub or a new in Lazarus/components?

Ondrej

Reply by email

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
to Ondrej Pokorny

2016-11-22 14:58 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus <

Show quoted text 13 lines
: On 22.11.2016 18:53, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: > Proposal: > Delete files in those folders and add README.txt pointing to new > repository. > What will be the new one and only repository? The one on GitHub or a new in Lazarus/components?

GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository

Luiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161122/fcdeda51/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
to Werner Pamler: Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every user…

2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus <

Show quoted text 11 lines
: Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every user will get notified at compilation that he is using an unsupported version. Shouldn't we do the same with - ZVDateTimeCtrls (in in Lazarus/components/DateTimeCtrls - csvdocument (is in fpc sources/packages(fp-base)

The maintainers or CCR admins should look at it

- lclextension (belongs to VTV somehow) ?

Someone else created a copy of it. I think who did must decide what to do

Luiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161122/1ea4e4f0/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Werner Pamler
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote 15 lines
2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus < <mailto:>>: Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every user will get notified at compilation that he is using an unsupported version. Shouldn't we do the same with - ZVDateTimeCtrls (in in Lazarus/components/DateTimeCtrls - csvdocument (is in fpc sources/packages(fp-base) The maintainers or CCR admins should look at it

Who is CCR admin?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161122/e8238895/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Ondrej Pokorny
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara: 2016-11-22 14:58 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < GitHub. Is necessary to sync with…
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote
GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository

What branch do you recommend? There seem to be no Lazarus packages either in the v4, v5 or master:

https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/lazarus_master/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/lazarus_v5/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/V5_stable/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/lazarus-v4/Packages

Should I create them or isn't VirtualTreeView-Lazarus supposed to be used in designtime? Or did I misunderstand something?

Ondrej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161210/dd1a05d7/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
to Ondrej Pokorny

2016-12-10 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus <

Show quoted text 27 lines
: On 22.11.2016 19:02, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository What branch do you recommend? There seem to be no Lazarus packages either in the v4, v5 or master: https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/ lazarus_master/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/ lazarus_v5/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/ V5_stable/Packages https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus/tree/ lazarus-v4/Packages Should I create them or isn't VirtualTreeView-Lazarus supposed to be used in designtime? Or did I misunderstand something?

The package file is on Source folder. The lazarus branches are the ones with "lazarus_" prefix. The others are Delphi only

Luiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161210/64dd0ec5/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara

2016-12-10 6:29 GMT-03:00 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <

Show quoted text 15 lines
: 2016-12-10 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < >: > On 22.11.2016 19:02, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: > > GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository > > > What branch do you recommend? >

lazarus_v4 or lazarus_v5

Luiz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161210/981332af/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Ondrej Pokorny
to Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote 5 lines
What branch do you recommend? lazarus_v4 or lazarus_v5

Thank you!

Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote
The package file is on Source folder. The lazarus branches are the ones with "lazarus_" prefix. The others are Delphi only

Oh, thanks. I missed that.

Ondrej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20161210/d883afba/attachment.html>

Reply by email