When storing a Lazarus project in a local Subversion or similar, what files should be added and what discarded?
As a particular example, should .lrs files be saved or are they better regenerated as required?

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2012-02
5 messages · 3 people ·
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
When storing a Lazarus project in a local Subversion or similar, what files should be added and what discarded?
As a particular example, should .lrs files be saved or are they better regenerated as required?
Well, i do not see much sense in put the lib files under version control. Unless the project is way too big and the compiling time is considered about. Even in that i don't think would be the case because would have to be a downgrade very big to make visible changes on that.
2012/2/20 Mark Morgan Lloyd
When storing a Lazarus project in a local Subversion or similar, what files should be…
When storing a Lazarus project in a local Subversion or similar, what files should be added and what discarded?
As a particular example, should .lrs files be saved or are they better regenerated as required?
You can remove them and replace the include directives with {$R *.lfm}.
Mattias
Noted, but that link suggests that if I want backward compatibility I'm best retaining them pro tem.
Yes.
Mattias