Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2012-01

Lazarus 0.9.30.2 + FPC 2.6.0

7 messages · 6 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Vincent Snijders
to Fabio Luis Girardi

2012/1/7 Fabio Luis Girardi :

Has some chance of a package Lazarus 0.9.30.2 + FPC 2.6.0 Win32+WinCE maybe released?

I don't think so, because Lazarus 0.9.30.2 passes -WG also for non-windows targets, and fpc 2.6.0 rejects it.

It could be fixed in a 0.9.30.4 (if it will ever be released) and is already fixed in trunk. Simply merging from trunk to fixes is not possible, because surronding code of the fix in trunk already uses build modees, which are not available in 0.9.30.x (IIRC).

Vincent

Reply by email

Unknown author
to Vincent Snijders
Show quoted text 13 lines
2012/1/7 Fabio Luis Girardi : > Has some chance of a package Lazarus 0.9.30.2 + FPC 2.6.0 Win32+WinCE > maybe > released? > I don't think so, because Lazarus 0.9.30.2 passes -WG also for non-windows targets, and fpc 2.6.0 rejects it. It could be fixed in a 0.9.30.4 (if it will ever be released) and is already fixed in trunk. Simply merging from trunk to fixes is not possible, because surronding code of the fix in trunk already uses build modees, which are not available in 0.9.30.x (IIRC).

But we can start work on 0.99 (a.k.a 1.0RC) and release it :) ...

zeljko

Reply by email

Sven Barth
to Vincent Snijders: 2012/1/7 Fabio Luis Girardi : I don't think so, because Lazarus 0.9.30.2 passes -WG also…
"Vincent Snijders" wrote
2012/1/7 Fabio Luis Girardi : > Has some chance of a package Lazarus 0.9.30.2 + FPC 2.6.0 Win32+WinCE

maybe

Show quoted text 10 lines
> released? > I don't think so, because Lazarus 0.9.30.2 passes -WG also for non-windows targets, and fpc 2.6.0 rejects it. It could be fixed in a 0.9.30.4 (if it will ever be released) and is already fixed in trunk. Simply merging from trunk to fixes is not possible, because surronding code of the fix in trunk already uses build modees, which are not available in 0.9.30.x (IIRC).

Ehm... I'm successfully using build modes in 0.9.30 at work... They were one of those features I looked forward to in that release.

Regards,
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/attachments/20120109/3d7e6108/attachment.html>

Reply by email

Mattias Gaertner
to Vincent Snijders
Show quoted text 8 lines
2012/1/9 Sven Barth : > Ehm... I'm successfully using build modes in 0.9.30 at work... They were one > of those features I looked forward to in that release. Revisions 31125 en 31127 need to be merged, but they depend on 28897, which seem to have to do with macros, not build mode, indeed: http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&root=lazarus&revision=28897 I don't know if it can be merged safely.

Probably not.

Mattias

Reply by email

Bernd
to Unknown author: But we can start work on 0.99 (a.k.a 1.0RC) and release it :) ... zeljko

2012/1/9 :

But we can start work on 0.99 (a.k.a 1.0RC) and release it :) ...

+1

This barrier must be breached. Letting go of the concept of reaching perfection while never actually being able to reach it (and documenting this never ending battle through asymptotic version numbers) only hurts once and only for a very short time. After this barrier has been breached we will all be free! :-)

Reply by email