Hello, Lazarus mailing list
I want to inform that trunk now requires fpc >= 2.4.0 to compile. Snapshots building is partly switched too. Please don't report any bugs regards that :)
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2010-01
7 messages · 6 people · –
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
Hello, Lazarus mailing list
I want to inform that trunk now requires fpc >= 2.4.0 to compile. Snapshots building is partly switched too. Please don't report any bugs regards that :)
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
Paul Ishenin wroteI want to inform that trunk now requires fpc >= 2.4.0 to compile. Snapshots building is partly switched too. Please don't report any bugs regards that :)
There are a lot of ver2_0 (2.0.4) related defines in unit intfgraphics, maybe time to start cleaning them out finally?
Gooed idea, there are indeed some
Marc
Hello, Lazarus mailing list I want to inform that trunk now requires fpc >= 2.4.0 to…
En/na Paul Ishenin ha escrit:
What's the latest revision working with 2.2.4?
Not that I'm interested in retrocomputing, but if in the future something similar to this happens happens again:
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2009-November/047179.html
I'd be like to be ready ;-)
Bye
I'm still stucked to 2.2.5 so r 23379 is your friend :)
Bye
2010/1/8 zeljko :
> > I'd be like to be ready ;-) I'm still stucked to 2.2.5 so r 23379 is your friend :)
Well, that is why you guys should have helped testing the 2.4.0-rc releases, otherwise what is the point of release a "release candidate".
So if errors creep in and get noticed just after a major release like 2.4.0, then only the users of FPC is to blame, as that is the only QA we have (unlike commercial vendors).
I didn't tell the reason of my problem (anchored at r23379). Why do you think that 2.4.0-rc wasn't tested ?