Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2009-09

Support for dynamic libararies/package ; Is this like bpl?

3 messages · 3 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Osvaldo Filho

Support for dynamic libararies/package ; Is this like bpl?

Freepascal future plan
# Next major Version (2.4)

* Language:
o Support for DispInterface and dispid (OLE binding on Windows). o Support for dynamic libararies/package

Reply by email

Thierry Coq
to Osvaldo Filho

Osvaldo,
you should ask the FPC team directly, I suggest. A release candidate of 2.4 is out (2.3.1 or something). How much is implemented?

In the meantime, it's possible to do Dispinterfaces and dispid in 2.2, although it is a manual activity. See my ExcelInterface unit as an example (here : http://tcoq.free.fr/composants.html)

An on the Lazarus page (here: http://tcoq.free.fr/Lazarus.html), there is an example of dynamic libraries on Lazarus. Also manual, but works.

Hope this helps,
Thierry

Osvaldo Filho wrote 17 lines
Support for dynamic libararies/package ; Is this like bpl? Freepascal future plan # Next major Version (2.4) * Language: o Support for DispInterface and dispid (OLE binding on Windows). o Support for dynamic libararies/package -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Osvaldo Filho: Support for dynamic libararies/package ; Is this like bpl? Freepascal future plan # Next…
Osvaldo Filho wrote 8 lines
Support for dynamic libararies/package ; Is this like bpl? Freepascal future plan # Next major Version (2.4) * Language: o Support for DispInterface and dispid (OLE binding on Windows). o Support for dynamic libararies/package

That is an old plan, and missing Delphi features were added there. (the "future") branch

There is no support for packages or the like in 2.4, so this item will be moved to the 2.5/2.6 branch.

Reply by email