If I was able to get Indy to compile and install under the FPC but not Lazarus, can I still use it?
Mailing lists / lazarus / 2009-07
Indy
4 messages · 3 people ·
- John Meyer 2
- Dave Parsons 1
- Graeme Geldenhuys 1
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
John Meyer wroteIf I was able to get Indy to compile and install under the FPC but not Lazarus, can I still use it?
Yes, but why would it not compile with Lazarus. Lazarus uses the FPC compiler. Lazarus is just the IDE or editor (in very simple terms).
Regards,
- Graeme -
________________________________________________
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
Show quoted text 8 lines
John Meyer wrote:
> If I was able to get Indy to compile and install under the FPC but not
> Lazarus, can I still use it?
Yes, but why would it not compile with Lazarus. Lazarus uses the FPC compiler.
Lazarus is just the IDE or editor (in very simple terms).
It does, I did this very thing with Windows yesterday. Apart from a bit of fun with paths I also had to edit a couple of Indy files. I used the latest Lazarus 0.9.27 win32 snapshot which includes fpc 2.2.5 & Indy 10.2.0.3.
Cheers,
Dave
Dave Parsons wrote 16 lines
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:26:05 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> John Meyer wrote:
>> If I was able to get Indy to compile and install under the FPC but not
>> Lazarus, can I still use it?
> Yes, but why would it not compile with Lazarus. Lazarus uses the FPC compiler.
> Lazarus is just the IDE or editor (in very simple terms).
>
It does, I did this very thing with Windows yesterday. Apart from a bit of
fun with paths I also had to edit a couple of Indy files.
I used the latest Lazarus 0.9.27 win32 snapshot which includes fpc 2.2.5
& Indy 10.2.0.3.
Cheers,
Dave
I was able to use lnet, but only when I downloaded the source code version of lazarus and compiled it in (using the rpm version for OpenSuse didn't seem to work).