Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 2008-08

Current version?

7 messages · 4 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Mark Morgan Lloyd

Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, little-endian).

What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the core developers?

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Joost van der Sluis
to Mark Morgan Lloyd

Op donderdag 07-08-2008 om 13:12 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Mark Morgan Lloyd:

Show quoted text 7 lines
Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, little-endian). What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the core developers?

Here we're using fpc 2.2.3 (thus svn fixes_2_2 branch) and lazarus-svn (trunk).

That's reasonably stable. And if lazarus becomes unstable, you could just revert to an somewhat older version which you remember does work.

Joost.

Reply by email

Mattias Gaertner
to Mark Morgan Lloyd: Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on i386 (Windows and…
Show quoted text 8 lines
Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, little-endian). What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the core developers?

The 0.9.24 is the most stable.
Then comes 0.9.25 with revision 15471.
The current 0.9.25 has currently some image problems, otherwise it is the best of all lazarus.

Mattias

Reply by email

Michael Van Canneyt
to Mattias Gaertner
Mattias Gaertner wrote 16 lines
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:15 +0000 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on > i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 > on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, > little-endian). > > What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of > being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the > core developers? The 0.9.24 is the most stable. Then comes 0.9.25 with revision 15471. The current 0.9.25 has currently some image problems, otherwise it is the best of all lazarus.

The best of all IDE's, you mean ;-)

Michael.

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Mattias Gaertner: On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:15 +0000 The 0.9.24 is the most stable. Then comes 0.9.25 with…
Mattias Gaertner wrote 16 lines
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:15 +0000 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on > i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 > on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, > little-endian). > > What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of > being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the > core developers? The 0.9.24 is the most stable. Then comes 0.9.25 with revision 15471. The current 0.9.25 has currently some image problems, otherwise it is the best of all lazarus.

Mattias, Joost: many thanks. I might be safest sticking with 0.9.24 + 2.2.0 for the moment since the Windows development machine is NT and I've previously seen problems.

I'll have another shot at building for ARM and raise any issues in a separate thread.

Later I'll try moving to something newer than 2.2.0 on all platforms and then 0.9.25 or later. One of the things I'm still trying to find time to look at is problems when a project is moved between x86 and SPARC which might be related to endianness.

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Michael Van Canneyt: The best of all IDE's, you mean ;-) Michael.
Michael Van Canneyt wrote 19 lines
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:15 +0000 > Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > >> Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on >> i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 >> on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, >> little-endian). >> >> What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of >> being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the >> core developers? > The 0.9.24 is the most stable. > Then comes 0.9.25 with revision 15471. > The current 0.9.25 has currently some image problems, otherwise it is > the best of all lazarus. The best of all IDE's, you mean ;-)

Needs a book, or at least a concerted effort to describe the underlying logic of how packaging etc. works. I guess at this point I'd like to once again thank everybody who's responded to my "where do I find" questions with consistent patience.

OT: there's "dog latin" and "pidgin english" but is there an expression for mangled Dutch? Elsewhere somebody's coined the term "clog" for a discussion to which the original poster keeps commenting as he works his way through a Delphi problem, and New Scientist yesterday had a report on 'Hanny's Voorwerp': voorwerp-oriented programming, anybody? :-)

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Michael Van Canneyt
to Mark Morgan Lloyd
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 25 lines
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > >> On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:12:15 +0000 >> Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: >> >>> Over the last couple of years I've been tinkering with Lazarus on >>> i386 (Windows and Linux) and SPARC (Linux), I'm mostly using 0.9.24 >>> on FPC 2.2.0. I'm currently trying to get it running on ARM (Linux, >>> little-endian). >>> >>> What is the current preferred version for non-core users, in terms of >>> being reasonably stable but with problems being of interest to the >>> core developers? >> The 0.9.24 is the most stable. >> Then comes 0.9.25 with revision 15471. >> The current 0.9.25 has currently some image problems, otherwise it is >> the best of all lazarus. > > The best of all IDE's, you mean ;-) Needs a book, or at least a concerted effort to describe the underlying logic of how packaging etc. works. I guess at this point I'd like to once again thank everybody who's responded to my "where do I find" questions with consistent patience.

The book is being worked on, and should be available (in German) around october.

Michael.

Reply by email