Well that's not a surprise, really... They don't call it beta for nuthin! Mmm...…
Tony Maro wrote 22 lines
So why not make both data and non-data aware control? On the other issue: if you are not satisfied about TCalendar, feel free to communicate what you need to change, or do it yourself, if possible, and send patches. Code duplication is not the best idea, IMHO - we should improve (or rewrite, if need be) what is available. We are aware that a lot of areas need improvements, TCalendar included.
Show quoted text 23 lines
The patch things is not really difficult, really. If you want to make a patch of your modification against current CVS tree, just do this command from the toplevel directory:
cvs diff -u [files...] > my_patch_filename.patch
you don't have to specify filenames, you may specify directories as well, or nothing at all, in which case all subdirectories and files in current directory will be examined for differences against current CVS tree.
See:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/CVS-RCS-HOWTO.html
or
http://linux.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2002/06/13/cvs.html
or search Google.
And of course, if you need to apply your patch do a:
patch -p0 -i [my_patch_file.patch]
and that's about it.
Michal
