Florian Klaempfl wrote

>I don't think so that he reads the lazarus mailing list. Sebastian, do you have any suggestions. I guess you'll use this stuff too :)

Yes of course, at least in the long term. And of course converting fpdebug to classes absolutely makes sense.

- Sebastian

Sebastian, do you have any suggestions. I guess you'll use this stuff too :)

That would be great. I think re-writing them as TObject's would benefit more than just the Lazarus project.

Pierre (if your listening) would you be willing to help out? I'm not familiar with exactly what the objects do that you have already written.

Thanks
Shane

>> 04/16/01 11:48AM >>>

I would strongly recommend it! Maybe Pierre Muller () will help you, he did/does
the debugger support of the text mode IDE.

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

I would strongly recommend it! Maybe Pierre Muller () will help you, he did/does
the debugger support of the text mode IDE.

Should we look at converting the classes in fpdebug to TObject's and use them as an interface to the debugger? This would allow any project to use this interface with FPC to create a debugger for their Graphical Development tool.

Thoughts?

Shane

Doesn't EVERYONE read it? :-)

I'll email him direct.

Thanks
Shane

>> 04/16/01 12:46PM >>>

I don't think so that he reads the lazarus mailing list.

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

I don't think so that he reads the lazarus mailing list.