Lazarus will be working using the standard win32 components, but that hasn't been written yet. It will be once we are confidient that the GTK version is working on Linux and Windows.

Once I have it running well under Linux I will look at the windows side if no one else volunteers.

Shane

>> 02/01/01 02:10AM >>>

Hi Lazarus!
Is Someone as tried tu use Lazarus For Win32 ?
There are Many Things don't Work :
- When IDE is Running , The CPU IS 100% used ...
- I Don't See Components In Window and Usually When I Try to Drop Down A Component , the application Crashes
- The Component Panel Is Not really Visible ( a further Version Was Better to display )
- The Editor Contents Is Not Visible ( There is only the Window )
- The Object Inspector Is In The Same Situation
In General Lazarus Win32 Is Worth Than Lazarus For Linux Perhaps Is It Because The Use Of GTK Layer ?
Is There A PossiBility To Use Native Win32 Layer?

Thanks A Lot !

Sorry For My Awfull English...

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Mattias Gaertner �����:

ShEdit has its own pas-highlighters, so you doesn't have to use anything except LoadFromFile and SaveToFile. Besides, it has its own cut/undo/paste abilities, so on this command (in menu) you can only call 'PE.Edit.EditUndo;' I can send you a demo tomorrow. As for your first (mwedit) editor, it WAS slow even when output was directed to /dev/null. I don't know about synedit. I'll download your soft...

Mattias Gaertner wrote

The reason for using synedit is, that is has most of the features lazarus needs and it seems to be fast to me. But I did not test GTKShEdit, so please tell me about its features.

GTKShEdit uses the SHEdit units (part of FCL), which itself contain only an editor core; GTKShEdit is just an editor widget/component based on SHEdit. I wrote it for testing SHEdit, as SHEdit was originally used for another project which used more complicated libraries. Although it's extremely fast, SHEdit still has some known bugs; and finally, it will be replaced by a much more powerful library in the future. (i.e. I have stopped further development of the old SHEdit units)

- Sebastian

Sebastian =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= �����:

I've fixed two bugs: Enter key and an absence of clipboard (now for only dummy clipboard).

Why don't you use GTKShEdit? Course, it is not lcl-orientated, but it is quick enough to work (at least, your swedit doesn't seem to be usefull because of slowness).

Slow?
It is somewhat slow because of the many writelns, but without them I do not notice any pauses or slow downs.
The reason for using synedit is, that is has most of the features lazarus needs and it seems to be fast to me. But I did not test GTKShEdit, so please tell me about its features.

Mattias

Why don't you use GTKShEdit?
Course, it is not lcl-orientated, but it is quick enough to work (at least, your swedit doesn't seem to be usefull because of slowness). GtkSHEdit has a bug, which disables enter I
succseefully fixed it, but (of course) didn't publish it. I've maid class, which is responsible for creating new
shedit window (destroing doesn't seems to work properly), which provides access to TTextDoc class. So, it might be usefull for lazarus. As lazarus has gtk-interface, shedit doesn't need any initialization/finalization. As for me, I'm planning to create usefull, stable IDE for FPC for Linux. It might include my fd2lcl.

FoodTechnologist wrote

I've fixed two bugs: Enter key

?

btw, I only remember that undo/redo sometimes crashes when dealing with multiple lines.

and an absence of clipboard (now for only dummy clipboard).

Hmm, GTKShEdit didn't support the clipboard, but the old KCL version (not available anymore) did. SHEdit itself is of course prepared for full clipboard support. [you probably have to know this already ;) ]

- Sebastian

Hi Lazarus!
Is Someone as tried tu use Lazarus For Win32 ?
There are Many Things don't Work :
- When IDE is Running , The CPU IS 100% used ...
- I Don't See Components In Window and Usually When I Try to Drop Down A Component , the application Crashes
- The Component Panel Is Not really Visible ( a further Version Was Better to display )
- The Editor Contents Is Not Visible ( There is only the Window )
- The Object Inspector Is In The Same Situation
In General Lazarus Win32 Is Worth Than Lazarus For Linux Perhaps Is It Because The Use Of GTK Layer ?
Is There A PossiBility To Use Native Win32 Layer?

Thanks A Lot !

Sorry For My Awfull English...