I relize there is a problem with a dated install but it would really only need to
be done when the compiler changed which has not been very often recently. Hell I don't want for it to change the ole ppc386 has been good to me lately.
Cliff Baeseman
------------------------------------------------------------------------ There is nothing wrong with Windows 2000 that LINUX won't fix!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earlier message 44 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Van Canneyt
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 8:11 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Install Shield
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Michael A. Hess wrote:
> codepunk wrote:
> >
> > Could someone make a install shield package of the source tree? This
> > would be a great thing for the win32 guys. I would do it myself but I
> > am making to much progress with the QT stuff to get side tracked with
> > it for now.
> >
> > Packages like CVS and make should be put in also and It would be cool
> > to automatically add the export paths and such.
>
> It would be too dated. I can make one (using Wise) but that would be
> good for today. In a week the source would be very outdated given the
> development being done. For example had I done it last Friday everything
> that you just put in for Qt wouldn't be there even though the site might
> talk about it. I don't have time to keep updating it every other day or
> so. When Lazarus is more stable and FPC is at a 1.0 release stage then
> we can make an full blown install.
>
> Any other opinions? If the general consensus is that we should have one
> then I will do it. Other wise I recommend that we wait.
I also think that this should be for binaries only, since the sources
evolve too fast.
I am making an installshield setup for Free Pascal already, for version
1.0...
Michael.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus