Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 1999-10

KCL editor still needed?

4 messages · 3 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Curtis White
to Sebastian Günther: do you still need the KCL SHEdit? I ask this because I have the impression that you are…

Yes, I would still like to try to use SHEdit. But we cannot really do much with it until we get the abstract class. I would be happy to help you with it if there is anything I can do. I just don't understand SHEdit well enough to write the abstract class.

Like Shane, I have been working to get mwEdit to compile under FPC just to try to get something working. It still isn't going to work for a while because there is a lot of code that has to be written for it to work. But if we can get it to compile, then that is much closer.

We just want to get an editor working soon. And since mwEdit compiles under Delphi, we have been working on it while you create the abstract class. Once you get the abstract class done, then we can work to implement SHEdit. But we just don't want to sit around waiting, so we are working to get mwEdit to compile in case we can't use SHEdit for some reason.

Curtis

On 21-Oct-99 Sebastian G�nther wrote 11 lines
Hi, do you still need the KCL SHEdit? I ask this because I have the impression that you are concentrating on mwEdit, and I have a lot of other things to do. If you won't use it, there is no point for me to adapt SHEdit at this time. [_if_ you need it, this is no problem, of course.] - Sebastian

Reply by email

Sebastian Günther
to Shane Miller: If SHEdit will be easily usable I think that added a Twidget (or whatever) class to make…
Shane Miller wrote
If SHEdit will be easily usable I think that added a Twidget (or whatever) class to make it work will be an excellent idea not just for us but for you. That will not only add additional uses for the editor but it could add some additional developers.

ok; the point is that the IDE is not my main focus for the next few days, as we are working on some much more important back-end things (KCL-C).
I will continue the conversion ASAP, but at the moment I'm really busy with all kinds of stuff.

- Sebastian

Reply by email

Shane Miller

If SHEdit will be easily usable I think that added a Twidget (or whatever) class to make it work will be an excellent idea not just for us but for you. That will not only add additional uses for the editor but it could add some additional developers.

I AM concentrating on MWEDIT because it compiles under Delphi and that's our main push for Linux : Take a component from Delphi and get it real close, if not perfectly, to compile.

Shane

>> Sebastian G�nther 10/21/99 12:21PM >>>

Hi,

do you still need the KCL SHEdit? I ask this because I have the impression that you are concentrating on mwEdit, and I have a lot of other things to do. If you won't use it, there is no point for me to adapt SHEdit at this time.
[_if_ you need it, this is no problem, of course.]

- Sebastian

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email

Sebastian Günther

Hi,

do you still need the KCL SHEdit? I ask this because I have the impression that you are concentrating on mwEdit, and I have a lot of other things to do. If you won't use it, there is no point for me to adapt SHEdit at this time.
[_if_ you need it, this is no problem, of course.]

- Sebastian

Reply by email