Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / lazarus / 1999-08

[Re: Components/Code needed]

2 messages · 2 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Michal Bukovjan

I second that. The XML structure is much more transaprent than the Microsoft's mysterious and all-in-one-place registry.

BTW, I heard rumours that even in Microsoft it is hard to find somebody who actually knows how this registry works internally :-(

Michal Bukovjan

"Michael A. Hess" wrote 35 lines
Jeff Wormsley wrote: > > One possibility would be to wrap the registry functionality onto files > that were accessed like INI files. The key tree stucture could be a > trick, but not too bad. This would allow the files to be treated > pretty much like normal conf files, in that they would be text > editable. The ini method would be easiest as I stated earlier since I have already written the TInifile and it is in the FCL. As to the tree structure that should be that much of a deal. It would just be a matter of loading all of the tree levels into one name and making that a section head Ex. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE-SOFTWARE-Lazarus] The tree itself is really just an illusion. The other alternative which in fact might be the best alternative would be to make it be an XML document. Then you could maintain the actual Tree structure and appearance in the file itself. Would make editing it very easy. I kind of like this idea better myself since we do hav XML capability in the FCL now. Opinions? -- ==== Programming my first best destiny! ==== Michael A. Hess Miracle Concepts, Inc. http://www.miraclec.com _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Reply by email