...
gdktypes.pp(1400,60) Note: Values in enumeration types have to be
ascending
gdkmain.pp(94,90) Error: Identifier not found TGDESTROYNOTIFY
gdkmain.pp(94,90) Error: Type identifier expected
gdkmain.pp(232,111) Error: Identifier not found TGDESTROYNOTIFY
gdkmain.pp(232,111) Error: Type identifier expected
gdkmain.pp(463,23) Error: Identifier not found PGMUTEX
gdkmain.pp(463,30) Error: Error in type definition
gdk.pp(65,1) Fatal: There were 6 errors compiling module, stopping
make: *** [gdk.ppu] Error 1

it seems that we need glib bindings also ...
glib is separated from gtk in 1.2

Sergio

You should use the latest CVS sources or wait until tomorrow 2:00 AM CEST, then the current sources which work are zipped and placed in the ftp

Everyone the stuff on the things needed page on my site are all for gtk 1.2 bindings.

Download the compiler and replace yours with the binaries provided.

Download the FCL from my site and install and compile.

Recompile the new GTK+ headers from the site also.

Finally compile the new lazarus source on the source page.

This is all stuff from the CVS that has been packaged for use.....

I have compiled using gtk+1.2.1 so it does work, lazarus has a few small problems but I will
work thru these tonight...

Cliff

When was this added? It wasn't working from the copy I got from Cliff. Did you just add this?

Last night around 2 am CEST :)

Don't you use CVS to update your compiler? Then you know that you've really the latest version. Because if i add something at 1:15 am then it will be available not be avail that day in the sources and thus 2 days later in the (go32v2,win32) snapshots of the compiler!

Peter

I have changed the definition for TGTKAttachOptions back to the old style becasue I couldn't get it to work as the new one. I believe the new one should be set up as a SET.

It's defined in gtkenums.pp

Shane

>> Cliff Baeseman 05/11 7:42 AM >>>

Everyone the stuff on the things needed page on my site are all for gtk 1.2 bindings.

Download the compiler and replace yours with the binaries provided.

Download the FCL from my site and install and compile.

Recompile the new GTK+ headers from the site also.

Finally compile the new lazarus source on the source page.

This is all stuff from the CVS that has been packaged for use.....

I have compiled using gtk+1.2.1 so it does work, lazarus has a few small problems but I will
work thru these tonight...

Cliff

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

I am currently converting the code.......
I dcidn't make and install all the stuff from the site. I simply copied it over my existing stuff.

Shane

>> Cliff Baeseman 05/11 12:21 PM >>>

yep I was hving trouble with that on gtk_table_attach last night because I could not or the flags....

Shane are you up and running GTK+ 1.2 stuff now?

Cliff

yep I was hving trouble with that on gtk_table_attach last night because I could not or the flags....

Shane are you up and running GTK+ 1.2 stuff now?

Cliff

I just made a snapshot manually. The CVS update had a conflict, so of course the automatic make didn't work.

There is a new snapshot available for linux; hopefully, there will be daily new ones.

BTW. The snapshots for linux are generated DAILY so you always have yesterdays fixes if you get the snapshot.

Michael.

The compiler build on my web site was built by Tom from CVS source yesterday...

Everything worked except the GTK or's which I just changed a little code in lazarus to account for it..
It was not a real fix but at least it will compile and run..

Cliff

I do not update through CVS either. I have enough trouble conifugring my Linux the way it is. I don't want to worry about compiling the compiler right now. Once I get used to linux more, then I'll do that. I'm more concerned with writing my code at the moment.

Shane

>> "Michael A. Hess" 05/11 2:26 PM >>>

Peter Vreman wrote

Don't you use CVS to update your compiler?

Speaking for myself, no I don't. I don't know about Cliff or Shane but I have enough to do keeping up with my code without worry about recompiling the compiler. I usually use the Linux snapshots which usually were available every day or everyother day. Unfortunately a new one hasn't been available now for almost a week.

Then you know that you've really the latest version. Because if i add something at 1:15 am then it will be available not be avail that day in the sources and thus 2 days later in the (go32v2,win32) snapshots of the compiler!

If I have to do it this way I will but I prefer not to. :-\

I've added support in the compiler for doing:

constant-enum or constant-enum

Using sets is not possible, becuase sets are always 4 or 32 bytes.

Peter

yep I was hving trouble with that on gtk_table_attach last night because I could not or the flags....

I've added support for that in the compiler, but only for constants. I also got the problem while fixing the examples (still not finished)

I didn't see any other way to translate those enums to pascal. I could add:

type
  TGtkAttachOptions=type longint;

support which comes from delphi and makes a new type which is not compatible with longint.

But then comes the problem. How do i define the constants that are TGtkAttachOptions? Because using

const
  GTK_EXPAND : TGtkAttachOptions = 1;

Is not possible, because that makes a typed constant. Maybe in the $J- (const are read-only) mode delphi handles it like normal constants, i've still to test that.

Peter

GTK_ATTACH_

When was this added? It wasn't working from the copy I got from Cliff. Did you just add this?

Shane

I've added support in the compiler for doing:

constant-enum or constant-enum

Using sets is not possible, becuase sets are always 4 or 32 bytes.

Peter

_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.miraclec.com/list_archives/lazarus

Peter Vreman wrote

Don't you use CVS to update your compiler?

Speaking for myself, no I don't. I don't know about Cliff or Shane but I have enough to do keeping up with my code without worry about recompiling the compiler. I usually use the Linux snapshots which usually were available every day or everyother day. Unfortunately a new one hasn't been available now for almost a week.

Then you know that you've really the latest version. Because if i add something at 1:15 am then it will be available not be avail that day in the sources and thus 2 days later in the (go32v2,win32) snapshots of the compiler!

If I have to do it this way I will but I prefer not to. :-\

Michael the one on the Lazaurs Website was from a compile on the CVS source yesterday. I usually use snapshots
but we are in a migration to gtk 1.2 so I went ahead and posted the latest

www.pcpros.net/~vbman

Everyting available there is for GTK+ 1.2^

Cliff

Peter Vreman el d�a Tue, 11 May 1999 13:47:29 +0200, escribi�:

I'm using cvs to update the sources...

TGDESTROYNOTIFY and PGMUTEX are defined in glib, not gdk or gtk

Sergio
(updating my cvs again rigth now)