Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2014-06

nonlcl widgetsets

3 messages · 2 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Giuliano Colla

Hi fpc wizards,

I'm interested in the nonlcl topic, and I tested the source found in the examples (designnonlcl).
But, getting it from trunk I stumbled into an error:

in the module mywidgetdesigner.pas,

/procedure GetObjInspNodeImageIndex(APersistent: TPersistent; var AIndex: integer); override;/

it complains that there's no ancestor method to override.

This procedure appears to be currently unused, and commenting it out makes it possible to compile, and play with the example.

Then I checked a previous stable version of Lazarus which I had at hand (version 1.0.8), and I noticed that this procedure isn't there.

Now my question is: is getting the NodeImageIndex a stale remnant of the past, or a new feature one must be aware of, because it'll come into play in future (making therefore unwise to develop anything before the dust settles)?

Thank in advance for any hint.

Giuliano

Reply by email

Sven Barth
to Giuliano Colla
"Giuliano Colla" wrote
Hi fpc wizards, I'm interested in the nonlcl topic, and I tested the source found in the

examples (designnonlcl).

Show quoted text 5 lines
But, getting it from trunk I stumbled into an error: in the module mywidgetdesigner.pas, procedure GetObjInspNodeImageIndex(APersistent: TPersistent; var AIndex:
integer); override;
it complains that there's no ancestor method to override. This procedure appears to be currently unused, and commenting it out

makes it possible to compile, and play with the example.

Then I checked a previous stable version of Lazarus which I had at hand

(version 1.0.8), and I noticed that this procedure isn't there.

Now my question is: is getting the NodeImageIndex a stale remnant of the

past, or a new feature one must be aware of, because it'll come into play in future (making therefore unwise to develop anything before the dust settles)?

Thank in advance for any hint.

You should better ask this on Lazarus list. It might be non-LCL, but it's not non-Lazarus ;)

Regards,
Sven

Reply by email

Giuliano Colla
to Sven Barth

Il 11/06/2014 14:11, Sven Barth ha scritto:

You should better ask this on Lazarus list. It might be non-LCL, but it's not non-Lazarus ;)

I was mistaken because I found the reference on a post of Michael in this list.
Sorry for the noise.

Giuliano

Reply by email