Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2012-11

BSD

7 messages · 4 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Mark Morgan Lloyd

Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least 's the preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Unknown author
Show quoted text 6 lines
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least 's > the preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.? I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.

Thanks Michael. Minimal research also suggests that it's got the best congruence with e.g. Apple's Darwin.

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Unknown author: I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD. Michael.

In our previous episode, said:

> Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least 's the > preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.? I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.

Pierre does OpenBSD and NetBSD, and the level should be decent, but still they are only on the first beta level.

OTOH, I don't get that much FreeBSD specific feedback either. Sometimes nothing a whole release cycle. At least as far as dynamic linking goes (making shared libraries in FPC), FreeBSD is less far than Linux.

Another reason to choose FreeBSD over net/oipen is that recent versions are much faster in Virtual Box.

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Marco van de Voort
Marco van de Voort wrote 14 lines
In our previous episode, said: >> Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least 's the >> preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.? > I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD. Pierre does OpenBSD and NetBSD, and the level should be decent, but still they are only on the first beta level. OTOH, I don't get that much FreeBSD specific feedback either. Sometimes nothing a whole release cycle. At least as far as dynamic linking goes (making shared libraries in FPC), FreeBSD is less far than Linux. Another reason to choose FreeBSD over net/oipen is that recent versions are much faster in Virtual Box.

OK, I'll try to get a copy going here and to run FPC up on it on occasion. I find Qemu isn't too bad with an x86 guest, I just wish that more OSes had been ported to UML (User Mode Linux) which provides an API rather than attempting to emulate a PC's hardware.

I might while I'm at it try a ReactOS guest and possibly Sanos: looks like the author of the latter has been tidying things up a bit so it's worth watching even if an FPC port is improbable.

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Graeme Geldenhuys
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote 7 lines
On 2012-11-21 12:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least 's the > preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.? > I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 for some CGI apps of mine, and it works without hassle.

Thanks Graeme. "Somebody" is, of course, a senior colleague- I'm not in this totally out of masochism :-)

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email