Hi,
Has anybody started work on supporting WebP image format for FPImage?
http://code.google.com/speed/webp/
Regards,
- Graeme -

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2011-08
7 messages · 4 people · –
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
Hi,
Has anybody started work on supporting WebP image format for FPImage?
http://code.google.com/speed/webp/
Regards,
- Graeme -
Not yet. But it looks very interesting.
Michael.
Michael Van Canneyt wrote> > http://code.google.com/speed/webp/ Not yet. But it looks very interesting.
It does indeed. I'm continuing work on adding FPImage support to fpGUI, and was curious about WebP because I read an article on it recently.
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
If you look around a bit you see also a lot of criticism. On the results of Google's tests, and the incompleteness of the reference implementation.
http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/541
http://muizelaar.blogspot.com/2011/04/webp.html
And of course browser support is still seriously lacking.
And api documentation isn't complete:
http://code.google.com/speed/webp/docs/api.html#encodingapi
Ludo
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: If you look around a bit you see also a…
None the less it is still interesting. Google trying to bring a new image format into today's times - it will have to be something very special to beat the likes of JPG, PNG etc.
I wasn't really asking if somebody will implement WebP support in FPImage, I was just curious if somebody has thought of it. Thanks for the links though, I'll read those tonight.
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
This is a repetition of earlier arguments in favour of jpeg2000.
We'll see how it progresses. Note that I'm not really negative, it is just more that I consider it to early along (too little 3rd party support, no undisputed reference lib) to invest major time in it.
But maybe there is sb with too much time and a special interest.