Michael Van Canneyt wrote 21 lines
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I've just taken our name server down for maintenance, and noted that a
> db-aware app I'd left running ground to a halt despite the fact that
> it was only activating queries, not establishing new (named) connections.
>
> The connection was being made by host name rather than by dotted-quad
> address, resulting in a long-term handle associated with the
> TPQConnection object. Whenever a TSQLQuery is activated, it results in
> the opening of a short-term handle, if I'm reading things correctly
> associated with a TSQLTransaction object which relies on the host
> information from the connection object.
>
> My expectation is that these short-term handles should not mandate a
> name lookup, since the host name or address cannot be specified at
> this point. Am I being unreasonable?
In order to support multiple transaction, a connection is created for
each transaction. So if you application creates transactions at regular
intervals, then it will perform a name lookup each time a transaction is
created.
The program is not creating explicit transactions and only has read access to the table. I'm establishing a connection during program initialisation and then alternating between two query objects, it's the activation of the query object which is causing a short-term handle to be opened.
Please excuse me for not having looked at the sources yet, but I presume that the client library is performing a name lookup if the initial connection was by name (hopefully it doesn't do this if the connection was by address). I'd suggest that the IP address could usefully be cached in case of name server failure, in the same way that other parameters are cached somewhere (for example, the password in the connection object can be wiped without affecting operation).
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]