Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2005-01

Debug server under win32

4 messages · 4 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

pascalive

How is the perspective to get the debug server, that comes in fpc/utils/debugsvr, working in win32?

I tried to compile it without sucess.

Luiz

__________________________________________________________________________ Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela. AntiPop-up UOL - É grátis!
http://antipopup.uol.com.br/

Reply by email

Alexey Pavluchenko
to pascalive

Hello all,

The installer says "too many packs" and closes immediately. When I delete some unnecessary package descriptions from install.dat it runs normally as supposed. Happens on Windows 98SE, did not test it on other machines.

Has anybody else encountered this problem? If no, what can be the reason for it?

Best regards, Alexey

Reply by email

Unknown author
to pascalive: How is the perspective to get the debug server, that comes in fpc/utils/debugsvr, working…
pascalive wrote
How is the perspective to get the debug server, that comes in fpc/utils/debugsvr, working in win32?

A rewrite for Win32 is required.

I tried to compile it without sucess.

It relies on Linux. I want to rewrite it using Lazarus, but there are about 3.124.654 other things on my todo list which come before this.

If you want to give it a try, please let me know, and I'll help wherever I can.

Michael.

Reply by email

Tomas Hajny
to Alexey Pavluchenko: The installer says "too many packs" and closes immediately. When I delete some…

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:27:06 +0200, Alexey Pavluchenko wrote

Show quoted text 9 lines
Hello all, The installer says "too many packs" and closes immediately. When I delete some unnecessary package descriptions from install.dat it runs normally as supposed. Happens on Windows 98SE, did not test it on other machines. Has anybody else encountered this problem? If no, what can be the reason for it?

Both install.exe and install.dat have been updated in the mean time, so the problem should be already fixed by now.

Tomas

Reply by email