Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2004-12

Internal Error 9999 on FC3

8 messages · 5 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Agustin Barto

I'm trying to rebuild the srpms of fpc 1.0.10 and 1.9.4 and I'm getting "Internal Error 9999" randomly during the compile process.

I'm running FC3 on an AMD Athlon 2600+. I'm guessing it has something to do with the distro, 'cause it used to work on FC2.

Reply by email

Florian Klaempfl
to Mattias Gaertner
Mattias Gaertner wrote 14 lines
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:36:50 -0300 Agustin Barto wrote: >I'm trying to rebuild the srpms of fpc 1.0.10 and 1.9.4 and I'm >getting "Internal Error 9999" randomly during the compile process. > >I'm running FC3 on an AMD Athlon 2600+. I'm guessing it has something >to do with the distro, 'cause it used to work on FC2. There are 1.9.5 srpms, built on FC3 at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89339

Did you have the execution randomization (or how it is called ;)) on?

Reply by email

Agustin Barto
to Jonas Maebe

I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it worked. I tried several times to check and everytime I had exec_shield on, the compile process got to an error at some point. I guess it does affect the compiler, or at least it does on my particular configuration.

Agustin

Jonas Maebe wrote 15 lines
On 4 dec 2004, at 16:02, Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> There are 1.9.5 srpms, built on FC3 at >> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89339 > > Did you have the execution randomization (or how it is called ;)) on? That was already available and on by default in Core 2 (and even Core 1, I think). It's only for dynamically linked binaries anyway, so it won't affect the compiler. Jonas

Reply by email

Jonas Maebe
to Agustin Barto
Agustin Barto wrote 5 lines
I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it worked. I tried several times to check and everytime I had exec_shield on, the compile process got to an error at some point. I guess it does affect the compiler, or at least it does on my particular configuration.

Exec shield is not the same as randomized addresses. That one can indeed affect any program. I don't know why it affects our compiler though.

Jonas

Reply by email

Agustin Barto
to Jonas Maebe

I had some problems with exec_shield and compilers (and intepreters) in the past.

Anyway, I'm just happy to have fpc working again :)

Jonas Maebe wrote 22 lines
On 4 dec 2004, at 19:18, Agustin Barto wrote: > I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it > worked. I tried several times to check and everytime I had exec_shield > on, the compile process got to an error at some point. I guess it does > affect the compiler, or at least it does on my particular > configuration. Exec shield is not the same as randomized addresses. That one can indeed affect any program. I don't know why it affects our compiler though. Jonas _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply by email

Nikolay Nikolov
to Agustin Barto: I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it worked. I tried…
Agustin Barto wrote 7 lines
I disabled exec_shield (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec_shield) and it worked. I tried several times to check and everytime I had exec_shield on, the compile process got to an error at some point. I guess it does affect the compiler, or at least it does on my particular configuration.

do not disable exec_shield, disable exec_shield_randomize ... or use fpc 1.9.5

Reply by email