Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2002-05

Why do all mirrors have a beta?

7 messages · 4 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Mattias Gaertner

Hi all,

Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30? And why do they not contain for example the TShiftState change from 2002/03/28?

thx in advance,
Mattias Gaertner

Michael Van Canneyt
to Mattias Gaertner
Mattias Gaertner wrote
Hi all, Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30? And why do they not contain for example the TShiftState change from 2002/03/28?

? The TShiftState change should be present. This was introduced in version 1.19 of classesh.inc, and that is the version which contains the RELEASE_1_0_6 tags.

Michael.

Marco van de Voort
to Michael Van Canneyt
Show quoted text 10 lines
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > Hi all, > > Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30? > And why do they not contain for example the TShiftState change from 2002/03/28? ? The TShiftState change should be present. This was introduced in version 1.19 of classesh.inc, and that is the version which contains the RELEASE_1_0_6 tags.

FreeBSD has it, I still had the release build dir:

$Log: classesh.inc,v $
Revision 1.19 2002/03/28 12:08:47 michael
+ Added sstriple and ssquad in shiftstate

Marco van de Voort
to Marco van de Voort
Show quoted text 16 lines
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30? > > And why do they not contain for example the TShiftState change from 2002/03/28? > > ? The TShiftState change should be present. This was introduced in > version 1.19 of classesh.inc, and that is the version which contains the > RELEASE_1_0_6 tags. FreeBSD has it, I still had the release build dir: $Log: classesh.inc,v $ Revision 1.19 2002/03/28 12:08:47 michael + Added sstriple and ssquad in shiftstate

And it is based on tag PRE3

Mattias Gaertner
to Marco van de Voort
Show quoted text 18 lines
> > On Mon, 20 May 2002, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30? > > > And why do they not contain for example the TShiftState change from 2002/03/28? > > > > ? The TShiftState change should be present. This was introduced in > > version 1.19 of classesh.inc, and that is the version which contains the > > RELEASE_1_0_6 tags. > > FreeBSD has it, I still had the release build dir: > > $Log: classesh.inc,v $ > Revision 1.19 2002/03/28 12:08:47 michael > + Added sstriple and ssquad in shiftstate And it is based on tag PRE3

Ok, so it could be solely a problem with the linux rpms. For example:

fpc-1.0.6-1.i386.rpm

This installs a fpc beta from 2002/04/30 without ssTriple/ssQuad. Probably the package misses some more changes.

Mattias Gaertner

Lee, John

He seems to be suggesting that the mirrors aren't being updated with latest release + v11s...J

> > Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30?

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

Mattias Gaertner
to Lee, John
John" wrote
He seems to be suggesting that the mirrors aren't being updated with latest release + v11s...J

They point to a prerelease candidate.
Not only the mirrors, but also the main site.

It looks weird to me, that these non-release rpms should be the only one available. Will they be replaced or do we have to build our own rpms?

> > > Why do the mirrors still have a beta fpc from 2002/04/30?

Mattias Gaertner