I was trying to suggest a new way that is o/s independent...
The current way is o/s independent! So i don't see why a new way should be created. It'll make things only more incompatible and complex.

Mailing lists / fpc-pascal / 2001-05
2 messages · 2 people · –
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
I was trying to suggest a new way that is o/s independent...
The current way is o/s independent! So i don't see why a new way should be created. It'll make things only more incompatible and complex.
To:
From: Peter Vreman
Subject: RE: [fpc-pascal]RE: filemode info for fpc docn - was w2000 file o Date sent: Fri, 11 May 2001 14:10:50 GMT
Send reply to:
It isn't fully OS independent, in fact, because FileMode constants don't have the same meaning on all supported platforms. The trouble John is having is probably caused by the fact that DOS with SHARE.EXE loaded (which is simulated by all VDMs) uses sharing mode of 0 (i.e. none sharing mode specified) as the so-called "compatibility mode" with basically the same behaviour as "deny none", whereas you have to use a specific (different) sharing mode number on other targets (including Win32 and OS/2) for this. We could probably add a workaround for this to do_open, the question is, whether we want to do so (it would break compatibility with previous releases, among other things).
Tomas