Adriaan van Os wrote 15 lines
> Am 10.01.2025 um 15:43 schrieb Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal:
>>
>> But now I install a system.ErrorProc and run the same program. It
>> emits, instead of the EBusError, Runtime Error 214.
>>
>> This puzzles me.
>
> This is as designed, because the ErrorProc is what is used by the
> SysUtils unit to convert runtime errors to exceptions. If you want to
> implement your own handling, then store the original value of
> ErrorProc, assign your own handler, do your own handling and at the
> end call the saved ErrorProc.
I don't want to handle the error, I want a meaningful error. And Runtime
Error 214 "Collection overflow" is nonsense.
The sole purpose of overriding System.ErrorProc is to handle errors by yourself. If you don't want to handle a particular error, do as Sven said (call the original System.ErrorProc), and then whatever custom error handler that was there before will do its thing. In this case: the error handler that was installed by the SysUtils unit, which will raise an EBusError exception (which seems to be what you want).
Jonas