Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Sk load fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2005-11
(no subject)
11 messages · 7 people · –
- Unknown author 4
- Marco van de Voort 2
- Florian Klaempfl 1
- Michael Van Canneyt 1
- Peter Vreman 1
- Tomas Hajny 1
- +1 more
Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription
Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.
Show quoted text 5 lines
Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
-Sk load fpcylix unit
what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils unit.
Marco van de Voort wrote 19 lines
>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>
> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>
>what is it for?
>
>
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
unit.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist -
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
where can i find it ?
Show quoted text 10 lines
>>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>>
>> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>>
>>what is it for?
>Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
>for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
> system/sysutils
>unit.
where can i find it ?
~/fpc>>> find . -name 'fpcylix.pp'
./rtl/linux/fpcylix.pp
where can i find it ?
Show quoted text 17 lines
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>>
>> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>>
>> what is it for?
>>
>
>
> Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
> for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
> system/sysutils
> unit.
where can i find it ?
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/trunk/rtl/linux/fpcylix.pp
Vincent.
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers for Kylix…
Marco van de Voort wrote 10 lines
> Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>
> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>
> what is it for?
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
system/sysutils
unit.
BTW, looking at the current implementation - shouldn't GetModuleName be changed to return name part of ParamStr (0) (without path and extension), and GetModuleFileName the complete ParamStr (0)?
Tomas
Tomas Hajny wrote 17 lines
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>>
>> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>>
>>what is it for?
>
>Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
>for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
>system/sysutils
>unit.
BTW, looking at the current implementation - shouldn't GetModuleName be
changed to return name part of ParamStr (0) (without path and extension),
and GetModuleFileName the complete ParamStr (0)?
No, the situation is more complex, that's not implemented yet.
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers for Kylix…
Marco van de Voort wrote 19 lines
>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>
> -Sk load fpcylix unit
>
>what is it for?
>
>
Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
unit.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist -
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
Show quoted text 23 lines
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
> >
> > -Sk load fpcylix unit
> >
> > what is it for?
> >
> >
>
> Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
> for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
> system/sysutils
> unit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist -
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>
>
>
>
Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
Yes, using an external resource compiler.
It will embed .xfm, .dfm and .res files.
But you'll still need an .rc -> .res compiler for icons, bitmaps etc.
Michael.
Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
Show quoted text 7 lines
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
>for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal system/sysutils
>unit.
>
Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
Forms are something of a higher level than FPC. They are compiled by an (external) resourcecompiler and then stored as a resource in a file.
However for CrossFPC's sake, resourcehandling has been made more compatible, but I assume one still needs a resourcecompiler for this.
Yes, using an external resource compiler. It will embed .xfm, .dfm and .res files. But…
Michael Van Canneyt wrote 48 lines
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 wrote:
>Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Interesting switch in FPC 2.1.1:
>>>
>>>-Sk load fpcylix unit
>>>
>>>what is it for?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Afaik it implicitely USES the fpcylix unit that contains some identifiers
>>for Kylix compat that we _really_ didn't want in the normal
>>system/sysutils
>>unit.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>fpc-devel maillist -
>>http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Is FPC able to compile Kylix forms (*.xfm) now?
>
>
Yes, using an external resource compiler.
It will embed .xfm, .dfm and .res files.
But you'll still need an .rc -> .res compiler for icons, bitmaps etc.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist -
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Is it automated in CrossFCP?