Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2018-06

3.0.5 merge request

6 messages · 3 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Ondrej Pokorny
to Marco van de Voort
Marco van de Voort wrote 5 lines
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said: > could you please merge r36749 (see > https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32163) into 3.0.x fixes branch > so that it will be available with 3.0.6? Done

Thank you.

but note that 3.0.6 is not planned atm, usually after .4 a new release branch is created.

I am very pleased to hear that. Do you already have a rough plan when 3.2 will be branched?

Ondrej

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Ondrej Pokorny

In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said:

Show quoted text 8 lines
Thank you. > but note that 3.0.6 is not planned atm, usually after .4 a new release > branch is created. I am very pleased to hear that. Do you already have a rough plan when 3.2 will be branched?

No, it hasn't been brought up yet. But we still have to branch and 9 months between branching and release would probably already be a record.

Reply by email

Luca Olivetti
to Marco van de Voort: In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said: Done, but note that 3.0.6 is not planned…

El 20/6/18 a les 15:23, Marco van de Voort ha escrit:

Show quoted text 7 lines
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said: > could you please merge r36749 (see > https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=32163) into 3.0.x fixes branch > so that it will be available with 3.0.6? Done, but note that 3.0.6 is not planned atm, usually after .4 a new release branch is created.

While you're at it, could you merge please r33906 (unless it is useless to do so due to the above remark)

fixes
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30208

Bye

Luca

Reply by email

Ondrej Pokorny
to Marco van de Voort: In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said: No, it hasn't been brought up yet. But we…
Marco van de Voort wrote 9 lines
In our previous episode, Ondrej Pokorny said: > Thank you. > >> but note that 3.0.6 is not planned atm, usually after .4 a new release >> branch is created. > I am very pleased to hear that. Do you already have a rough plan when > 3.2 will be branched? No, it hasn't been brought up yet. But we still have to branch and 9 months between branching and release would probably already be a record.

Thank you for the information. I have sent some bugfixes to mantis that I really want to get into FPC 3.2.x so I'll rather not wait with a reminder.

Ondrej

Reply by email