Jonas Maebe wrote 11 lines
wrote:
> i thought this was a very interesting discussion...
>
>
https://gist.github.com/rygorous/e0f055bfb74e3d5f0af20690759de5a7
>
> thanks to john carmack (@ID_AA_Carmack) for retweeting this from Fabian
> Giesen (@rygorous)...
The point is kind of irrelevant in case of FPC, because overflows (signed or
unsigned) are not undefined here. Every type is guaranteed to exhibit the
behaviour defined by 2's complement for its particular byte size.
ahhh... i was kinda hoping that this would be the case... if it weren't, maybe a li'l something to bring it to the attention of the devs...
strong typing for the win, again! :)
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
