Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2015-12

fcl-net for Solaris etc.

3 messages · 2 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Mark Morgan Lloyd

Can anybody confirm that the comment reference to netdh.h in fcl-net/src/cnetdb.pp should actually be netdb.h, because I'm having a lot of difficulty reconciling that with reality.

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Mark Morgan Lloyd

In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:

Can anybody confirm that the comment reference to netdh.h in fcl-net/src/cnetdb.pp should actually be netdb.h,

Yes. At least it was back then. (and according to the Paul Vixie author reference, some time before)

because I'm having a lot of difficulty reconciling that with reality.

Because?

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Marco van de Voort
Marco van de Voort wrote 10 lines
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said: > Can anybody confirm that the comment reference to netdh.h in > fcl-net/src/cnetdb.pp should actually be netdb.h, Yes. At least it was back then. (and according to the Paul Vixie author reference, some time before) > because I'm having a lot of difficulty reconciling that with reality. Because?

I was having a lot of difficulty reconciling the comment's reference to netdh.h with reality because I can't find that file on any local machines and all the Google refs to it look like typos. In the case of Solaris 11 the structure that needs to be checked appears to be in netdb.h

I've just raised 29223 on Mantis with a patch to enable cnetdb for Solaris (tested on SPARC OpenSXCE 2014). I'm afraid that I don't have access to any of the BSDs which similarly lack it (anybody?).

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email