Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2015-09

Re: What means -Oodfa ?

4 messages · 3 people · –

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Joost van der Sluis

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Marcos Douglas
Verzonden: do 13-08-2015 19:29
Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] What means -Oodfa ?
Aan: FPC developers' list ;

Show quoted text 12 lines
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Am 22.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb Juha Manninen: >> There are some false positive warnings. > > Trunk or fixes? > >> [...] > > This should be fixed in trunk. Could be fixed in "fixes" too?

I don't know. Florian, do you know the revision and is it mergeable?

Regards,

Joost.

Reply by email

Florian Klämpfl
to Joost van der Sluis
Joost van der Sluis wrote 20 lines
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Marcos Douglas Verzonden: do 13-08-2015 19:29 Onderwerp: Re: [fpc-devel] What means -Oodfa ? Aan: FPC developers' list ; > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Florian Klaempfl > wrote: > > Am 22.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb Juha Manninen: > >> There are some false positive warnings. > > > > Trunk or fixes? > > > >> [...] > > > > This should be fixed in trunk. > > Could be fixed in "fixes" too? I don't know. Florian, do you know the revision and is it mergeable?

I think r29636. It looks mergable to me.

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Florian Klämpfl

In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:

Show quoted text 6 lines
>> Could be fixed in "fixes" too? > > I don't know. Florian, do you know the revision and is it mergeable? > I think r29636. It looks mergable to me.

Conflict on the is_dfa IF, must be done/resolved by hand.

Reply by email

Florian Klämpfl
to Marco van de Voort
Marco van de Voort wrote 9 lines
In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said: >>> Could be fixed in "fixes" too? >> >> I don't know. Florian, do you know the revision and is it mergeable? >> > > I think r29636. It looks mergable to me. Conflict on the is_dfa IF, must be done/resolved by hand.

Merged.

Reply by email