Hello together!

I've finally come around to implement support for partial specializations. Partial specializations are for specializations of generics inside another generic. Up to now simply the generic type was used instead of a specializations (e.g. TTest instead of TTest<LongInt>) which often resulted in failed type checks. With the addition of partial specializations the amount of these errors should hopefully be decreased and I'll check the corresponding bug reports in the next few days.

Nevertheless partial specializations quite heavily changed how the parsing of generics works and thus I need your help. I already checked that there are no regressions in our testsuite, but maybe our testsuite does not yet contain a test for something that is now broken. So if you use generics OR you use nested records (yes, I needed to change something there as well) then I'd like you to test whether any regression in your code was introduced between the following Free Pascal revisions:

27860 (no partial specializations)
27861 (partial specializations)

So if something fails in revision 27861 that did not fail in 27860 I'd like you to report this with tag "partial specializations" (it should already exist in the tag list) and I'll fix that ASAP.

Thank you very much. :)

Regards,
Sven