Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2011-09

Building without the fp IDE

6 messages · 4 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Mark Morgan Lloyd

Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building fp which I'd rather not stop to look at right now (although I'll try to report it later).

For the moment I've commented out the IDE=1 line in Makefile.fpc.

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Henry Vermaak
to Mark Morgan Lloyd: Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE? I'm trying to…
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote 7 lines
Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE? I'm trying to build trunk for SPARC so I can test the two recent FPC fixes plus another in Lazarus and am getting an error when building fp which I'd rather not stop to look at right now (although I'll try to report it later). For the moment I've commented out the IDE=1 line in Makefile.fpc.

I don't think there is another way. Perhaps the fpc team will accept a patch like this?

Index: Makefile.fpc
=================================================================== --- Makefile.fpc (revision 19024)
+++ Makefile.fpc (working copy)
@@ -152,10 +152,12 @@
ifneq ($(wildcard ide),)
IDETARGETS=go32v2 win32 win64 linux freebsd os2 emx beos haiku ifneq ($(findstring $(OS_TARGET),$(IDETARGETS)),)
+ifndef NOIDE
IDE=1
endif
endif
endif
+endif

[rules]
.NOTPARALLEL:

Henry

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Graeme Geldenhuys: Delete the 'ide' folder? :) A 'svn revert' can always restore it later. - Graeme - fpGUI…
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote 5 lines
On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp > IDE? Delete the 'ide' folder? :)

But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email

Vincent Snijders
to Mark Morgan Lloyd

2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd :

Show quoted text 9 lines
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: >> >> Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE? > > Delete the 'ide' folder?  :) But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that?

I would just try it, these lines from Makefile.fpc may support it: # Compile also IDE (check for ide and fv dir)
ifneq ($(wildcard ide),)

Otherwise, I would try
make IDE=0

Reply by email

Mark Morgan Lloyd
to Vincent Snijders
Vincent Snijders wrote 14 lines
2011/9/9 Mark Morgan Lloyd : > Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >> On 09/09/2011 14:34, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: >>> Is there a "correct" way of telling the build process to skip the fp IDE? >> Delete the 'ide' folder? :) > But won't the top-level makefile rules object to that? I would just try it, these lines from Makefile.fpc may support it: # Compile also IDE (check for ide and fv dir) ifneq ($(wildcard ide),) Otherwise, I would try make IDE=0

Thanks Vincent, I'll have a play once I've achieved the primary objective which is to test fixes other people have contributed recently: not to do so promptly would border on the ungrateful :-)

Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

Reply by email