************************************************************************ *** WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING -- WARNING *** ************************************************************************ *
* The e-mail-message appended below is list- or mailserver-related *
* That type of mail will by definition not be processed on this system
* and in general is not accepted in the fidonet.org-domain. *
* To avoid these bouncings the listkeeper is kindly requested to
* remove any subscription coming from a z2.fidonet.org-style address. *
* If you have reason to believe your message was removed without due
* reason then kindly inform ''.
*
************************************************************************
From: Lee, John @2:292/862
To: fpc-develop @2:5020/1305.201
Subj.: RE: [fpc-devel]TP compatible fsplit()
Dated: 05 Sep 00 11:46:27
[processed here: 06 Sep 00 09:58:39]
@TOPT 201
@INTL 2:5020/1305 2:292/862
@MSGID: knuth.logica.co.uk 4b4f5f06
@REPLYADDR:
@REPLYTO: UUCP
@PID: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
@CHRS: LATIN-1 2
@RFC-Received: from vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu (
[193.6.40.1]) by infomag.iguana.be (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16382 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 20:47:07 +0200
@RFC-Received: from vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu ( [127.0.0.1]) by vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA26405; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:46:48 +0200
@RFC-Received: from cav.logica.co.uk (cav.logica.co.uk [158.234.10.66]) by vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAB26390 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:46:44 +0200
@RFC-Received: from eckert.logica.co.uk (eckert.logica.co.uk [158.234.10.17]) by cav.logica.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07171 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:46:37 +0100
@RFC-Received: by eckert.logica.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <SH580LX4>; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:46:34 +0100
@RFC-Message-ID:
@RFC-Sender:
@RFC-Errors-To:
@RFC-X-Mailman-Version: 1.0rc2
@RFC-List-Id: FPC developers' list <fpc-devel.lists.freepascal.org> @RFC-X-BeenThere:
From: "Lee, John"
To: "''"
Reply-To:
Marco, my main concern (& Thomas's comments) refer to the program I included, which was a 'real' one to do a real task eg recursive directory search, didn't work for win32 & go32 in dos box (even for normal 8.3 files, let alone for funny names or long names) but did for tp...IMO we need to try to fix this, with minimum/(ideally 0)changes to the source...Otherwise we'll just have to flag it as another incompatibility. John
