Sign in Join

Live chat for Free Pascal, Lazarus, Delphi and every Pascal programmer.

Mailing lists / fpc-devel / 2009-10

request to merge fpdoc patch with 2.3.1 fixes branch

7 messages · 4 people ·

Reply by email Subscribe to this list Your subscription

Read-only archive. Use j and k to move between messages.

Vincent Snijders
to Michael Van Canneyt
Michael Van Canneyt wrote 14 lines
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a minor patch for the 'fpdoc' tool. Could this be merged > with the v2.3.1 branch as well, so that it is available in the next > stable FPC release? > > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14917 No. The tag for 2.4.0 releas is already set.

So, it is safe to the fixes branch, so we are sure not to forget it for 2.4.2?

Vincent

Reply by email

Michael Van Canneyt
to Vincent Snijders
Vincent Snijders wrote 18 lines
Michael Van Canneyt schreef: > > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I submitted a minor patch for the 'fpdoc' tool. Could this be merged >> with the v2.3.1 branch as well, so that it is available in the next >> stable FPC release? >> >> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14917 > > No. The tag for 2.4.0 releas is already set. > So, it is safe to the fixes branch, so we are sure not to forget it for 2.4.2?

Just to avoid confusion, I wouldn't merge anything till 2.4 is out ? But this should be decided on core.

Michael.

Reply by email

Vincent Snijders
to Michael Van Canneyt: Just to avoid confusion, I wouldn't merge anything till 2.4 is out ? But this should be…
Michael Van Canneyt wrote 25 lines
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote: > Michael Van Canneyt schreef: >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I submitted a minor patch for the 'fpdoc' tool. Could this be merged >>> with the v2.3.1 branch as well, so that it is available in the next >>> stable FPC release? >>> >>> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14917 >> >> No. The tag for 2.4.0 releas is already set. >> > > So, it is safe to the fixes branch, so we are sure not to forget it > for 2.4.2? Just to avoid confusion, I wouldn't merge anything till 2.4 is out ? But this should be decided on core.

Maybe it is time to revive
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Useful_changes_not_in_the_fixes_branch

Having such a list is not only useful for Lazarus, but can be used by distro builders to avoid known issues with the release too.

Vincent

Reply by email

Marco van de Voort
to Vincent Snijders

In our previous episode, Vincent Snijders said:

Show quoted text 8 lines
>> So, it is safe to the fixes branch, so we are sure not to forget it >> for 2.4.2? > > Just to avoid confusion, I wouldn't merge anything till 2.4 is out ? > But this should be decided on core. Maybe it is time to revive http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Useful_changes_not_in_the_fixes_branch

http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpctomerge.txt

http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcbuildtomerge.txt

http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcobjctomerge.txt

Updated hourly.

What is the rush btw?

Reply by email