Mailing lists / fpc-devel

fpc-devel · 2003-06

1. fpc1.1 build error

   Compiling the 1.1 gives me: Fatal: Can't find unit LINUX make[3]: *** [syncobjs.ppu] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/fpc-1.1/fcl' The file is…

   MMMMattias Gaertner, Marco van de Voort, Michael Van Canneyt6-29-2003 17:24 UTC
   8
2. 1. new() bug? 2. another bug i guess :>

   It seems that I found 2 bugs(31th May, binary+source snapshot 1.1 , not from cvs). 1. new() doesn't allocate memory correctly under specific circumstances, moreover it…

   MPPMaly, Pavel V. Ozerski, Peter Vreman6-16-2003 11:03 UTC
   3
3. Polish translation of error*.msg

   I've translated errore.msg to Polish. Who should I send it to get it added to CVS? It is possible to include it in 1.0.8 release? I suspect it's too late but who knows :)

   WMPWojciech Malinowski, Michael Van Canneyt, Peter Vreman6-13-2003 08:02 UTC
   6
4. Method address

   What does it exactly mean "wrapped procedure"? One idea: There can be passed address of procedure that is nested in a method, but it cannot access to object's data…

   MMr. Ego6-9-2003 11:59 UTC
   0
5. compilation of fpc pdfs 1.1 fails

   I tried to create fpc rpms for the 1.1 and got the following: --- snip --- + make -C docs pdf FPDOC=/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/fpc-1.1/utils/fpdoc/fpdoc make[1]: Entering…

   MMMattias Gaertner, Marco van de Voort6-9-2003 10:43 UTC
   1
6. Unit not used ?

   Ever since upgrading to CVS 1.0.7 [2003/04/02] for i386, I have been getting some strange compiler hints: unit_one.pp(119,13) Hint: Unit UNIT_TWO not used in UNIT_ONE…

   JJPJeff Pohlmeyer, Jonas Maebe, Peter Vreman6-8-2003 08:17 UTC
   3
7. Linux/PPC port of FPC working

   I'm very happy I can announce that for the first time, yesterday a "make cycle" worked under Linux/PPC! This means that compiler was able to compile the RTL and itself,…

   JBKJonas Maebe, Balogh, Karoly (Charlie/iNQ6-4-2003 17:56 UTC
   8
8. 68k codegen patch

   Here is my first fix to the 68k codegenerator. Hope it's ok. It's needed because the original codegenerator sometimes generated instructions like lsl.l #10,d2 which is…

   BBKBalogh, Karoly (Charlie/iNQ, Balogh, Karoly (Charlie/iNQ6-4-2003 15:10 UTC
   1